Make a better argument or give up and be okay with being wrong? Idk I don’t have much experience with what you’re going through
1 Like
Perhaps I could have said It better
Its not in the English dictionary, yes it’s recognisable as sort of Egyptian by a human.
But you’re asking for some sort of automatic check. ie computer.
How will a computer program recognise Anucksunamen and Ngita and Scr0tieMcB as OK. but not Itlsncptfjswp or Iapgjfbwkxjc?
What about Hvernighefurþupao??
The point is if the match it against the English dictionary, all 3 would fail,
if they match it again every name in the world at least one of three would fail,
if the match it against English grammar rules at least one of three would fail,
Don’t they literally already have AI for this sort of thing? The difference between actual names and gibberish, is pretty clear already.
Any fringe case that you are referring to (aka someone with a gibberish name who actually wants it to be that way) can be quickly and easily pushed through with a simple ticket for a human to validate that this is indeed an actual person who actually wants ocoswjpcnspqlal as their name. Many apps already have ways to “get verified” and it’s really not a big deal, all it really does is deter and prevent bad actors (aka botters) from infesting a platform.
The idea is to get rid of bots, and bot names. To make it more difficult for them to crank out dummy accounts. It is really not very complicated (unless you make it to be for some reason). Tbh I have no idea why you are even trying to rationalize against this, unless you enjoy playing against pejcigjxnspfks and are okay with bots flooding the game with ease and impunity. I’m not sure why you want that or would defend that.
Are you talking to the mirror? I was making a figure of speech that “you could have quadrillions of people saying something wrong and they would still be wrong”, and your answer was “not that many people exist”.
I’m sorry but I don’t see your argument anywhere. If quadrillions of people say something is wrong, it probably is. I’m not even sure what you are referring to with this latest comment of yours (I did scroll to try and figure it out, to no avail…)
It seems you are still in dire need of making a better argument. Or at least one that can be followed and understood. If you can do that, I’d be glad to evaluate it.
No. You have to study a bit more how arguments work. A lot of people can be dumb; it doesn’t mean you should follow them; don’t make me waste my time giving historical examples (you can find them yourself).
Yes. You need to study a bit more how math works
True, true, again, what is your point or argument? I’m still waiting patiently for it. Are you incapable or what’s the deal?
1 Like
You could just use the report feature. Botting is never going away. Sorry.