Thanks.
First, one little thing: preformatted text, please? 
Then, to the deck list, which looks quite similar to mine — so I might not be that bad at it.
You mean those featuring Stitched Giants and the like?
Got it, thanks.
You mean the Acolyte of Death? Yep, that’s what I’ve been thinking, but… AoD + Crop Rotation is 6 mana, 8 with the Army of the Dead, 5 with the hero power, but drawing only one card, which is a bit slow vs faster decks (DH, Hunter and the like), while the Baron gives 2 cards more or less as is, one of them immediately. In other words, the AoD has a higher ‘ceiling’, but a lower ‘floor’, while the Baron is more stable. So is it more about ‘techning’ vs aggro or control or am I missing something?
I’ve been really torn between those two.
1x (1) Runes of Darkness
Only one? But isn’t an extra Quartzite Crusher, for example, good in the meta? At least that’s what I’ve been thinking, but am I wrong?
Hmm… I’ve been considering this card, but is it good and how do you even use it? Vs aggro, you might not have enough corpses in the early game (and if you do, you might have cleared their swarm already), vs control (e.g. Warlock?), the guy doesn’t look impressive, and DHs might imprison or bypass it.
Hmm… I don’t know if I like that card very much. 
It can backfire so badly… But at least it’s optional there, i.e. in the ETC band, so you could choose something better…
Again, only one? But isn’t it decent?
By the way, the third ‘discover’ card — Necrotic Mortician — doesn’t seem that popular. Can’t say I like it either, but what exactly is wrong with it? Too big of a discovery pool?