With ZERO evidence.
I already called this out and they got all sassy - If one wants to “PROVE” something, then use a current scientific model - Record it. Peers. Witnesses.
A N Y O N E could come here and say “Hey all I did a 5,000 Temper Cycle and I can confirm that Tempering is BS and Weighted!!!1!!@#!”
Certain shills, namely the Totally Wonderful Awesome Troll Squad 
will absolutely and utterly 
all over it.
Conversely - hyper-posters and players-of-unhealthy-time-investment and a bizarre attachment to said game will gush when someone says - What they want to hear.
Confirmation bias based on zero evidence.
Yet - conversely - Joe/Jill nobody who says their 5k “Temper Test run” showed XYZ results - they’ll have a following that those who align with some Mr/Mrs Mysterio MAFFS person with ZERO evidence would dispute tooth and nail(as they do everything that doesn’t fit in their little bubbles…regardless).
Without evidence it’s all conjecture.
Without core parameters it’s all conjecture.
IT IS ALL confirmation Bias and I do not believe YOU or Patho-logical liars & shills(like some around here).