Multiple difficulty instances killed PVP

PVP was never alive to begin with - and that’s a good thing.

Play some fortnite COD for pvp.

PvP in Diablo has alway been secondary we want to kill monsters in the millions

Sadly that means the small minority of players that do like pvp have to take the back seat

It sucks I know but i don’t think pvp would ever truly thrive in this game

Are you an HOA president by chance?

1 Like

Another virgin giving love advices… sweet, your advice is considered my friend, thank you.

Alone I have about 100 pvp videos, which already proves you don’t know what you talkng about.

Yes, all i’m asking is basics, thats not a lot.

True I’ll give that but the entire community was screaming for endgame content not pvp

So they gave us more endgame content maybe in the future they will look at pvp but I bet my left :chestnut: it will a glancing look

PvP is not and never will be where this games bread is buttered

Blizzard combined with Microsoft is probably one of, if not the, largest company in the world.
They can do both simultaneously.

Asking for pvp players meet in the same instance is not asking much.

Trust me mate they put pvp in this game appease the small group of ppl that do engage with it.

I know it’s not what you want to hear but it’s truth.

PvP was never popular in Diablo hell PoE was so confident that no one would pvp they didn’t even bother putting it in their game

So count yourself lucky you have pvp at all

Its a minority, yes.
Yet is not a small audience like you think they are.

A simple basic change adding a ladder of kills is already enough to make Fields of hatred LAG the instance capping players. No effort at all.

If devs thinks i’m wrong i dare them to make it happen.

Then what are waiting for chief sign up to work for blizzard and fix it.

Should be easy

I like to work and i’m not woke, so chances are close to 0.

Then I guess we will never know

If there is a pop-up indicating that there is a pvp kill ladder as soon as the game is opened.

The number of players who would test their builds in pvp would be countless.

This is a fact. I would bet 10k dollars in my take.

Very tiny, but VERY vocal minority.

You and maybe a dozen players care about pvp. Nobody else does.

Rightfully so. This is not the game for that. Plenty of competition around with pvp in mind or in focus.

It’s not the fish that’s dumb cause it can’t climb a tree.

You don’t know ANY of these numbers.
That’s your opinion, from someone who hasn’t stepped into fields of hatred more than twice.

You maybe right but here is the biggest problem …your asking them to make two different games

PvP requires pretty strict balancing to succeed we can both agree on that.

While the current game wants you to feel like a god and yes the balance is all over the place that we can ALL!! Agree with

It’s my opinion that these two philosophies will never mix well sure they could try but it would suck

and your opinion is that blizzard should invest time and money into pvp.

my opinion is that they shouldn’t and are right for not having invested into it.

Again, an ARPG is not a pvp focused game.

You can mention your twelve buddies and your hundred videos as many times as you want.

Just because you think McDonalds should offer noodles or steaks and you find a dozen people who agree with you, does not mean your claims are valid.

1 Like

This is not an opinion, they already did, they invested in 2 zones for it. This is objective fact. Their own actions are hurting their product (fields of hatred) that they already made.

I never asked for that, thats your strawman. “again” what? you are debating about something you made up.

They made a theme park and closely watched where all the traffic went.

It wasn’t the pvp zones

Fine.

Have your hard-on for pvp.

I don’t care enough to make another 20 posts - clearly you can not be reasoned with.

I’m still saying, you’re in the wrong for expecting anything else than what you’ve already been given.

You’ve had countless ideas in this thread how to push people to pvp - none of them financially viable. Spending even a single cent on pvp development is never going to return the investment. Hard to accept, but it is what it is.

…and to re-iterate my opinion, that is completely fine.

If you’re so hellbent on PVP, you have any number of other games you can play. Fact of the matter is, you don’t want to do that, you want a taylormade experience here, which is unreasonable for more than one reason.

Anyways, good luck and have fun.

If a fast food serves option A and option B, but option B is served raw. It is obvious that option A will be preferred.

Im glad, don’t need love advices from a virgin.