Companion skills bugged (Druid) Lucky Hit limited at 100%

I put many Lucky Hit nodes in paragon boards but Raven and Wolves’ Lucky Hit stops at 100% (while other skills can go more than 100%)

Are you 16+ and had some math classes in your life?

2 Likes

You might want to check into how lucky hit chance works in D4. It’s more complex than you think. Probably unnecessarily so. Amounts over 100% are used in some situations.

h ttps://maxroll.gg/d4/resources/lucky-hit-mechanics

I know how lucky hit works.

There is the base chance, the bonus to lucky hit and the effect it triggers.

If the base chance of a skill is pushed to 100% through lh bonus there is always the triggering of the effect.

If the triggering for example says 40 % chance to make you pink, than in 40% of every triggering you get pink as a result

There is no necessity of exceeding 100 % for the triggering.

Triggering and result are not the same.

You might want to actually read the article. It explains why skills can exceed 100% lucky hit and how that impacts lucky hits from items. It’s more complex than you think.

I read it and if Blizzard confirms this equation I would laugh because that would be Blizzard math.

There should be no chance that % triggering should be able to go above 100% and in this way to push the effect chance to exceed the shown percentage. This is wrong on a lot of levels.

So my assumption would be, that some smart guy at Blizzard implemented the 100% cap at the rework of the companion skills for the new items. Because this would be correct.

Yes, Blizzard apparently instituted a more complex math system than a straightforward 100% chance =100% occurrence system. This is pretty common in D4, unfortunately. Multiple mechanics rely on similar systems.

I suspect the OP’s question about some skills being capped while others aren’t is relevant. And that some of them shouldn’t be capped now.

1 Like

It would be wrong in the first place. There would be no need for the separation of % trigger and % result if this equation would be correct.

It would break their hard printed % chance for result on skills and aspects and so on.

Sorry, but I’m pretty sure Maxroll is wrong with this equation and wanted it to sound more complicated and “scientific” as it is.

So again you were wrong and multiple times telling others they were wrong.

Do you wonder why we have to devs posting here anymore?

Probably going to try and insult me for disagreeing with you.

Why should i insult you?

There are not multiple persons saying something otherwise.

We have a discussion about a topic. Like adults. And one of the subjects in this discussion is an equation on a no Blizzard website. I repeat a non Blizzard website.

Your comment on devs not showing up here has nothing to do with the subject and is pure whataboutism.

1 Like

It is explained the best on maxroll.
But your saying they are wrong.

Yeah, i would argue and have done it, that this equation on maxroll is wrong.
Because it makes no sense with the premises of seperating lucky hit triggering and lucky hit effect and it would break the hard printed % chance on aspects/skills/paragon boards an so on.

Your argument is, they are right, and a chance of triggering capped at 100 is a bug?
Oh wait, no you have no argument so far.

And for repeating, maxroll is a non Blizzard website, who has monetary interests in having visitors.
So as long as Blizzard do not confirm this equation, is absolutely possible, that they are wrong.
I do not say, that they did this on purpose.

Also i could be, that is clear of course.
So if you have nothing substantial to say, you could also stay away from the thread. It is an option.

My lord.

Im going to believe maxroll over you every single time.

There was no argument in the first place. All you have is an opinion.

I have read some comments from you and sorry, i don’t see you as an authority to decide what is an argument or what is an opinion.

Believe whatever you want.

1 Like

Lol.

So we just take what you say as gospel even over maxroll?

That is called being a hypocrite fellow forum member.

Where is your proof where is your article or website breaking it down? Or do we just believe you’re right.

Can you please come out of your black/white bubble and use your brain before you write such nonsense.
Because everything you wrote in your last statement is crap.

You guys (yeah i assume, you are a red one) seem not capable any more to even see, what is a discussion, what is the purpose of a discussion and what can be seen as a result of a discussion.

And please fight your inner demon to see any person as enemy, that must be attacked (via wording in this case), who is not confirm with your worldview.

See i was right again you go to insulting now.

Whats next block me? Now youre not even talking about lucky hit.

Call me a dumb 16 year old like you did to the guy above?

We want proof not just your word.

This is golden lol

Ok. Whre did i called him a dumb 16 year old?

You only read, what you want ro read to feed your narrative.
But we luckily have a solution on this forum, we can ignore each other in the future. What at least i will do.

This a compliment?

That shows you i read everything not just what i want.

I wont ignore you as i love trying to figure out some of these crazy thought processes.

No.

You forgot maybe, what you wrote.
You wrote of an insult not an compliment.
It seems, you can’t even stay for two comments on the same topic.
Or is everything not a compliment an insult for you?
You ever heard of a spectrum. compliments and insults for example are possible ends of a spectrum but there is a lot of space in between.

You seem like a person, that thinks in extremes.
That would explain, your jump from insult to compliment and your whole argumentation in this thread and some others. A black/white thinking.

1 Like