Blanket statements like this are almost invariably false. The OP is not accurate either. I think it is best not to label an entire community based on the actions/words of a subset.
I speak for myself and no one else. I think that other people at times will post similar opinions to what I have. If you notice when I write, I frequently use “few”, “many”, and “subset”.
I have the sense (and correct me if I am wrong) that you feel I am one of those who only post opinions and feelings; however, many have termed me “table guy”. What does the tables include? Facts from Blizzards leaderboards that anyone can check. For as much criticism that I have received, no one has stated in column 3 row 2 your number was wrong. Rest assured, if I made a factual error in these tables, people would let me know. I have annotated some tables to reflect a class is being nerfed in patch 2.6.7 (Wizards and necromancers) and provide the actual data (and a note of an estimate of power).
FYI only:
Not trying to extend this discussion, but this one is in from the other thread. The person brought one of Don Vu’s post. Original link is here:
I highlighted the lines where the observations can be made.
There are always going to be people that don’t understand why others don’t roll over and take one in the tailpipe, because that’s what a good little beta does. Right OP?
You won’t find these people trying to inject themselves into a productive meaning game mechanics discussion, those sorts of things aren’t safe for people like the OP. They will wholeheartedly climb on a high horse and call out others for being passionate though. This OP is a fine example of this disgusting mindset.
Grow a pair and write what you really want to, that you are glad barbs got nerfed. (not you Tune)
These forums can be toxic, not because of the barb community but because the members of all communities who troll, misrepresent, and gloat when something gets taken away from others.