A strict remaster realm meets that definition. If I asked for the modern realm to replace the strict remaster than you would have a point. Since I advocate to have two realms: strict remaster and modern real with more options, your point is moot.
1 Like
Seperate game mode means you wanted at game creation to decide what changes are in the game. That means the players are still on the same realm but now you you want different realm. Yep your opnion is getting flipped/flopped.
1 Like
Here is what I wrote back in February.
If at character creation, it would just be like selecting hardcore/softcore, ladder/non-ladder, and would be a separate game mode. You can not play a hardcore character in softcore. Your non-ladder character can not play ladder. Separate game modes.
I said A or B back in February. Since I have realized that A is not an option for some time, I have consistently advocated for B afterwards.
1 Like
Just wish I could use the same shield in both weapon slots as a one-handed melee player, doesn’t make sense to have a badass sword and shield, and just because you want to switch to javelin, your character has to put away the shield too and switch to a crappier one.
Yeah and you was loud on not split playerbase so A was your favorite.
Flipp/flopp
How do you reach this conclusion, since I said Blizzard can decide? Reading this statement from February as shown below, it sounds like I do not really care which was implemented and said let Blizzard decide.
On March 2, I wrote:
So I think your idea that I am against splitting the playerbase is not based in reality.
1 Like
I have no problem with mules. Just spoiled d3 grown up players. But shared stash is also not changing the gameplay cus its serves the same goal as mules (bigger inventory but you can move items easier). On the other hand like immunity or ploot cryers are different thing.
Micro,
Since you and many others have referenced the poll quite often and you want split realms, would it be fair to say we can have a strict remaster realm and a modern realm without personal-loot? Since that wasn’t as popular as some of the other choices. In fact, a pretty large majority of people didn’t want personal-loot at all unless there was a caveat, which there is no reason to believe there would be one. It only seems reasonable that the majority “yes” changes get passed into such a realm. Or would the modern realm be more like a wild west realm where they just throw in changes willy-nilly? I don’t think so.
Anyway, this would be perfect for me.
I think the modern realm can have more optional changes. The most popular would be cow king kill reset.
In terms of the question about the loot system, 39% of respondents wanted to keep the game FFA only. The rest were either unsure (12%) or wanted one of 2 personal loot options.
I do not support a wild west realm where changes are thrown in willy-nilly.
Even if they don’t touch any balancing issues, I would LOVE for them to fix the Amazon zeal ability (forgot the name), the druid fury, and a few things like that. Honestly, some bugs allowing people to skip lowbies to Hell Chaos and such should stop too.
Reality huh? As others also stated back then there is good reason why you hiding your posts and why building up thousands and thousands comments. But was nice try flipp/flopp guy.
These are all from a single post in March 20. I do not think that we need to have separate realms due to an impact on the trade economy.
Just to highlight this senence:
Please note that I said that it does not need to be two distinct realms just based ion a trivial difference in trade economy. There are other reasons that a separation that might be preferred, such ad the hostility between those that favor the status quo and progressives
Money.
How you think the salaries of the developer teams who will end up creating 2 different versions of the game are going to be paid for huh?
Ahh pls again very weak try.
Blizzard presumably is releasing D2R to keep interest in the diablo franchise as D3 has aged and D4’s release is far way. If D4 were releasing this year, D2R would not.
My views are far more nuanced than that. Please quote it all and not some snippet out of context. I also clealry state keeping it separate is also possible.
I still believe that if the only factor was the item economy and that was the only change between a strict remaster and modern realm was the additional of optional personal loot, then separate realms would not be necessary, if the pro/anit-ploot advocatess could coexist.
Out of context. Yeah right. You wrote you prefer changes (loot type)on game creation level and not on realm level. You was not talking from economy. This is still very weak lie Micro.
You stilll have not quoted things in context. The post reads in full:
While I wouldn’t mind personal loot, I think the biggest changes I want (outside of the key rebinds we didn’t get for beta 
) are just some balance updates, and a modern take on ladders to not gate the content so much, especially with the removal of tcp/ip.
Console wise though…I’d love to see more opinions from console players, as I think personal loot and charm inventory would be the big two there, outside of actually having lobbies, since it seems the console versions of D2R are running off of the D3 checkpoint system for multiplayer.
And you still talking from loot and not from economy. 1 post but you talking from 2 seperate things. The truth is that you are exposed flipp/flopp guy and trying to hide behind the usual “out of context” thin excuse.