Nerf Thread on General

I do not know the post histories of others in that thread in detail; however, I do know my own. First, I have a longstanding history of asking for balance, both nerfs and buffs. I already provided multiple links to prior posts to demonstrate this fact. Many of these are on the new forum. Here are a couple examples from August:

Here is a quote about nerfing crusaders:

In addition, I was one of the people who expressed strong reservations about bazooka after is initial discovery on the forum. Here is a post I wrote in July:

I also have historically advocated for nerfs to other OP classes and buffs to weak classes. Many of these were in the old forum so I can not link them anymore.

Is there a reason that you had not noticed my posts on the old forum where I advocated for game balance. I strongly suspect that it is related to observational bias. In the old forum, I had ~2000 post, but only 2 were in the barbarian forum. In contrast, you had thousands of post but the vast majority were in the barbarian forum. Prior to the new forum, I did not have a sense of your post history as I visited primarily general discussion while your posts were in the barb forum. Since you have never commented on my posts in the old form, I assume that you do not know them in as much detail as I know them.

Given these documented posts, I think it is fair to say that I have a long-term passion for game balance that is class agnostic. In addition, I asked for barbarian buffs.

The following quote is from ~Why People Ignore Facts | Psychology Today

"Our ability to reason did not develop simply to help us find the truth. Instead, reasoning evolved to fulfill fundamentally social functions, like cooperating in large groups and communicating with others.

This is one of the arguments advanced in “The Enigma of Reason,” a book by cognitive scientists Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber. According to their theory of reasoning, reason’s primary strengths are justifying beliefs we already believe in and making arguments to convince others. While this kind of reasoning helps us cooperate in a social environment, it does not make us particularly good at truth-seeking. It also makes us fall prey to a number of cognitive biases, like confirmation bias, or the tendency to search for information that confirms what we already believe. "

We all fall victim of “motivated reasoning” and confirmation bias. In these cases with respect to a certain false belief, people ignore facts, seek additional arguments to support their false belief, respond emotional (often resorting to name-calling), and seek comfort and affirmation in like-minded individuals. “Adam Ruins Everything” is clearly illustrative of people’s misperceptions.

1 Like