D3 could be great again

I’ll take your word for that one. It’s been a while since I lost interest.

It’s a copy paste from past discussions.

It’s good enough for the purpose. Seriously take a business economics class. It’s very useful.

Yeah it’s really not. Greater Rifts are the carried to absurd extremes version. A dungeon hunt would be rational by comparison.

There is no rational argument against stupid.

It’s not the year 2000 any more either.

I’m sorry you’ll have to write in English if you want me to understand you.

Who said anything about doing it now? They’re never going to remaster Diablo III.

Diablo III never won a overall game of the year award for console or any other platform.

There’s the understatement of the decade.

1 Like

And again. Is it your shareholder expertise that makes you say that games that don’t win game of the year awards are mediocre?

1 Like

Your record is broken. I’ve already answered that and it’s a gross misrepresentation of what I said.

You didn’t answer and it’s not a misrepresentation of what you said.

You said D3 was mediocre.

I disagreed.

And then you said that D3 didn’t win any game of the year award as proof.

So again, is it your shareholder expertise that makes you say that games that don’t win a game of the year award are mediocre?

1 Like

I would rather play D3 over D2.
D4 will be the best Diablo game moi hahahahaa.

That’s the same misrepresentation. I’ve found neutronium again.

No link then.

Yup, very useful indeed and that is why you should really take the business economic class instead of asking people to do so. You need it.

Doesn’t change the fact that it was a concept that widely used in many modern ARPG.

True enough especially when there was a guy who thinks changes are bad.

People can buy D2 in 2012 after D3 was launched though.

I am writing English. Not my fault you have terrible reading comprehension.

That is nothing but wishful thinking on your part. They will remaster D3 in the future.

Doesn’t deserve one.

Been there done that and actually know the difference between sales and profits.

Wheels are a concept widely used in the modern world. Car tires and and casters are both wheels but not interchangeable any more than the ordinary dungeon hunt and greater rifts.

Not all just the counterproductive ones.

I can also buy buggy whips. That doesn’t mean there’s a huge market for them any more.

The sentence I’m referring to is pure word salad.

I’m not wishing it wouldn’t matter if they did. They won’t because it will be rarely if ever requested and it wouldn’t be profitable.

Of course, you will say that because you have no link.

Clearly, you don’t though.

Yet you will still be going to see GR-alike in modern ARPG whether you like it or not. :slight_smile:

And D3 doesn’t have counterproductive changes.

Then the game wasn’t as good as you think in the present.

Not my fault you can’t understand such a simple sentence.

Clearly, the “white elephant” is profitable enough for them to keep feeding it until now. If it is not profitable, they would have abandoned it completely before they announce D4 like what they did to D2 in the past.

So yes, they know what they are doing more than you did.

I’ve found more neutronium.

They still have Diablo II ladders and the servers are still up. They never abandoned it they put it into maintenance mode and support slowly dwindled. They’ll do the same with Diablo III except it will never be remade. They may even do the same with Diablo IV eventually if Blizzard lasts that long. They wouldn’t by the first studio Activision killed or reduced to nothing more than a name.

Is this what you are going to say everytime when you have nothing to back it up? :rofl:

Pretty decent (lol) defensive mechanism I must say.

No it’s what I say when encountering the densest known material in the universe.

So, this is how you protect yourself by convinced yourself that others are wrong or dense.

I protect myself with a 9mm I abandon pointless discussions with dense people with a simply declaration.

Says the guy who started the pointless discussion first.

It became pointless, and repetitious, it didn’t start that way.

Neutronium is a hypothetical material from the centre of a neutron star.
If we’re going with hypothetical stuff, what about vibranium or unobtainium?

1 Like

Available evidence suggests, that moneyum beats all of them. And is currently the most valuable resource known to the human beings.

Man, you just can’t be honest can you.

Here is you calling D3 a mediocre game:

Here is me disagreeing with you:

And here is you justifying that D3 is a mediocre game by saying it never won a game of the year award:

So again, is it your shareholder expertise that makes you say that games that don’t win a game of the year award are mediocre?

1 Like