A rewrite of "Path of Wisdom"

Years ago, when I first was playing D3: Reaper of Souls, and stumbled across the first of the “Path of Wisdom” tomes left by Malthael in the Pandemonium Fortress, it immediately gave me chills.

This group of lore books starts off innocuously (“I heard a sound, and did not know what it was…”) and progresses from there to Malthael deciding that the only sensible thing to do is to commit genocide against the entire human race.

Malthael’s path is essentially a dark mirror image of Tyrael’s journey. The Archangel of Justice comes to the realization that the only way to truly serve justice is to make a choice, and that means he must cast off his angelic immortality and live among mortals. But Malthael is essentially addicted to certainty : (“I sought wisdom in the chalice, but there was none…”). And so when he realizes that the old order once held in place by the Worldstone is gone, and that the new axis of the world is human beings and their ability to choose, he is lost. Rather than making the same choice as Tyrael, and seeking wisdom as a mortal, he decides that the only “wise” thing to do is to remove the source of his discomfort, which means exterminating all of humanity.

It’s a terrifying progression for the former Archangel of Wisdom, and, IMHO, one of the best, most interesting, and most tragic bits of lore in the history of the Diablo franchise. But I’ve always thought that the text as a whole was maybe a little flabby, and perhaps not quite in the right order. So here is my rewrite of the sequence- I hope you like it.

7 Likes

Malthael had always been the voice that guide and led the Angiris Council (as well as most of angelkind), he was their leader, whose knowledge and insight was well respected by all angels. As Imperius had stated:

        *"Malthael would never had been one without an answer"*

Malthael’s wisdom was a tool for himself to wield in order to lead Heaven and battle the Burning Hells, it was what he relied on and it greatly aided him without fail… until the theft of the Worldstone. For the first time, Malthael was without answer, he couldn’t provide knowledge or insight. He couldn’t answer the crucial question of the Worldstone’s location, the sacred stone that Heaven and Hell have fought eons over. It was the beginning of Malthael’s decent into madness. We see a bit of this during the events of the sin war trilogy, when Malthael was asked to vote, and yet Malthael did not take the opportunity to guide his angelic brothers and sister and instead abstained and that his demeanor radiated with such death that his voice gave chills to the humans present.

Wisdom was his strength and nourishment, yet it also served as his undoing. This was also because Malthael was too rigid and shortsighted. He wasn’t adaptable with the way he saw wisdom (just as you said). Rather than trying to see the wisdom in Humanity (as Auriel sees the hope in them), or understanding that his lack of wisdom pertaining to them isn’t necessarily a bad thing (just as Itherael doesn’t see the fact that being unable to see the fate of Humanity and Nephalem isn’t a bad thing); He began viewing humanity’s eradication as a necessary objective, one that took priority over truly defeating the Burning Hells regardless of the consequences. He spent his time constructing instruments that were capable of shattering souls, such as the soulsmasher, to the point that Tyrael wondered how long himself and the rest of angelkind hadn’t noticed Malthael’s madness.

He plotted to have the black soulstone remain in the high heavens long enough for the Angiris Council to vote on humanity’s destruction, despite the fact that the black soulstone was slowly corrupting the Heavens and causing corrupted angels to be born and twisting the angiris council.

Instead of negotiating, Malthael ordered his reapers to attack the High Heavens in an attempt to destroy the portal leading to the Battlefields of Eternity and prevent the Nephalem from following him. This act caused the death of many angels and even made Imperius (someone who greatly respected Malthael and hated humanity) question his brother’s sanity to the point of believing Malthael was sick and suffering and thus needed to be put down.

Upon meeting the Nephalem in battle and seeing their strength, Malthael destroyed the black soulstone in order to absorb the essence of the Prime evil within himself in order to augment his abilities without possibly considering the following:

  • in the case of his death (which happened), the Diablo along with the other great evils will be freed and eventually revive.
  • Even if he won, Malthael would’ve likely faced great corruption that would’ve damned him for all eternity.
  • Destroying the Black Soulstone also meant stopping his ritual of genocide upon Sanctuary. Which meant that to finish the job, he and his reapers would’ve had to contend with Sanctuary’s remaining survivors as well as possibly his angelic brethern.

In the end, Malthael served as an example, that angels don’t have to undergo demonic corruption to fall. And instead their hubris, arrogance, and foolishness can do the job just as well, if not more so. And I imagine we’ll see the consequences unfold further in Diablo 4.

4 Likes

Would be nice to see Diablo lore on the big or small screen, animated or live, but I feel that it would be a complete failure. Those bringing it into viewership will go out of their way to ignore and/or deviate from the source material and input their own stupidity.

Let’s just pretend that politics, lifestyles, and agendas would not be that stupidity, but instead, their own personal ideas/imagination on what they think will be ‘better’ for the story/lore/source material than has been around since 1996. That’s bad enough, isn’t it?

I am not a fan of animation, tho I do have to admit some are very good, but I think Diablo would be better as an animated vs. live show or movie. I am thinking something along the lines of Spawn. That was done very well.

Though if it was done live, all I can think about is Guillermo Del Toro. The first Hellboy and Pan’s Labyrinth comes to mind.

But, I guess there are always books and the games for those that are interested in the lore.

3 Likes

If I recall Inarius was a high level Arcangel and adviser to the Angiris council, Tyrael’s lieutenant. If so, he was not just your run of the mill average angel, but a force to be reckoned with even prior to his defection.

Actually, I think it was more like Tyrael was Inarius’s lieutenant! His lore books certainly give the impression of a seasoned veteran speaking about a young, idealistic comrade.

I think Tyrael’s lieutenant was Izual, who is captured in the Burning Hells and corrupted (and who we then kill twice, once in D2 and again in D3).

1 Like

Izual was Tyrael’s lieutenant.

However yes, Inarius was an archangel who served as an advisor to the Angiris Council.

Inarius served beside Tyrael rather than beneath or above, and even then he wasn’t in the same league as Tyrael (or the other members of the Angiris Council for that matter). The closest being that Tyrael had as an superior was Malthael (and even then it was more akin to a brotherly bond) and the crystal arch, as one of the reasons Tyrael took up the mantle of wisdom was due to the crystal arch telling him to.

Now how powerful Inarius will be in Diablo 4, I have no idea. However the D4 cinematic trailer alone at least shows that Inarius likely gained much of his strength (his original strength, not the augmented strength he had during the sin wars). I’m certainly looking forward to learning more.

3 Likes

Hnnnng so very exciting.

If Izual was Tyrael’s one and only lieutenant and Inarius was an advisor to the Angiris Council which one would be more powerful when they were both in heaven? Are lieutenants also considered archangels? I am trying to figure out the chain of command. It sounds to be like Inarius would have more say. It also looks like Izual turned to the dark side, Inarius was tortured in prison but now wants to take on the demons. But I could be wrong.

Inarius would’ve likely been Izual’s better in terms of combat and battle. For starters, he’s not only strong, but he’s a smart fighter, who’s able to use his head (for the most part), unlike Izual who’s simply strong yet goes into battle recklessly regardless of the situation.

As far as I’m aware of, Izual hadn’t ever been referred as an Archangel. Instead he’s been referred to solely as an angel, which leads me to believe that Izual is simply an angel rather than an Archangel. A powerful angel ofc, but an angel nonetheless. And for the most part, an archangel greatly surpasses an angel in terms of prowess.

As far as the chain of command within the High Heavens, it seems to go akin to this: from highest to lowest:

  1. Crystal Arch
  2. The Original Five Archangels of the Angiris Council
    • Tyrael, Malthael, etc.
  3. Archangels
    • Inarius for example
  4. Angels who served directly as a lieutenant to an Archangel
    • Izual, Urzael, and Balzael for example
  5. Rest of angelkind
  6. …Sadly Mortal Tyrael

Of course, there’s other factors, such as situations, or what part of Heaven does an angel serve at, what role does that angel have, and whether they serve under an Archangel that also determines the chain of command. But with that said, the Angiris Council members have great influence within Heaven and can even order the lieutenants of other Archangels around if they see fit. For example, Auriel dismissed Balzael (a lieutenant of Imperius), when he and Tyrael were in a fierce disagreement, despite Balzael being appointed to guard over the black soulstone.

But long story short, yeah Inarius would’ve had greater authority and influence than Izual, however his authority and influence would fall short to the rest of the Angiris Council.

1 Like

At the risk of being contrarian… Malthael was right!! :stuck_out_tongue:

But my favorite is Inarius, of course!
I am really excited to see his love rekindled, with him going back to Hell to meet his old sweetheart again! :slight_smile: