More room for game name/descrip

Could we get some QOL changes to the number of characters allowed for game name and game description. Currently there is only so much space in which to type I believe we need at least twice as much space if not more especially in the game description.

It can be very hard to describe what you have for trade or what you need. Most new players have no clue what half the abbreviations mean, it’s like a new language you have to learn in order to trade.

Being able to describe your game in a way that is understandable to all will be better for the players. Instead of seeing game names like “4osevortshi4jah” we would have enough room to actually type “4 socket eth vortex shield for jah rune”. Instead of seeing “bring script” and then in the description “sc life+atkrtg/life+res or gc life+maxd” , you could see “bring small charms with life and either attack rating or resist, or bring grand charms with life and max damage” in the description.

Personally I feel that this change will be good for trading in game. If more people can clearly understand what you have for trade or what you need they may enjoy it more.

just my 2 cents :slight_smile:

lets see how they do it

Yeah, game isnt out yet, put this on the back burner for now

I know the game isn’t out yet that’s exactly why I posted , hopefully someone will see and take it into consideration. There’s plenty of other posts in the forums about topics and the game isn’t out. Who are you to say my idea isn’t important and people don’t want to discuss it? Rude.

I suppose that could come under QoL, I am just happy that we will be getting lobbies, too many modern games do without them entirely and you are forced into wholly random games.

Yeah if it was totally random games without descriptions I probably would have refunded, yesterday. Don’t need a bunch of randoms joining and leaving constantly because they’re not doing the same things.

Have you seen the new lobby? There was a photo released which showed it, it looks great.

Seems like a good change they could/should add, assuming it takes next to no time to implement. I think people are dismissing this because they would rather see dev time being used on more important things. This seems like a change they could make that wouldn’t upset anyone, purist or non. I don’t know how you argue a negative on this one lol