Two copy for me at least
If dead games like Overwatch, Hearthstone can get 5 expansion/update a year.
Can diablo 2 get 1 expansion??? CMON BLIZZARD
9 Likes
I don’t understand… It already has 1 expansion.
As far as one more franchise expansion… Diablo Immortal filled that gap.
Lets di it!!! 20char
Keep in mind the products Blizzard has been making in their recent releases…
Just considering the most recent additions to D2R (sunder charms and terrorized zones), I don’t think I would enjoy what their ideas seem to be bringing to the table 
1 Like
NO to throwing more money at this game as a bribe.
I already need preparation H
1 Like
If they make act 6 they have to make new cinematics. I dont think they do it because baal has to by the end boss. But what i would love is 3 other quests in act 4. only if u do this 3 quest, hadriel let u go to diablo.
6 Likes
I’d rather pay for them to put an end to the BOTS, then invest in a new act!
4 Likes
Blizzard makes more from banning bots and them rebuying the game afterwards than the player base is willing to pay to get rid of them.
Keep in mind three things:
1: Blizzard is a company, their goal is to make money.
2: Botters are part of the player base.
3: This is a one-time buy, play as much as you want game.
Thus, the bots remain.
Botters are to Diablo as a sponge is to water.
2 Likes
Imagine how bad it would be. Might as well be asking the makers of candy crush to add D2 content. If corporate hired the right people to do it, yeah it’d be awesome. But they’d just pull from the hearthstone team or something because they’re cheap.
2 Likes
Or at least some kind of endgame like D3 rifts or adventure mode, where you can try to progress further and further each run.
Something to let keep you playing after you beat the game and grinded the desired gear.
It’s never going to happen… Leave it alone!
1 Like
Maybe if Microsoft fixes blizzard, but even then it won’t happen.
Yall fail to realize D2R was a cash grab and free advertising for d4. Just because some or even most would pay for new content doesn’t mean it would be profitable even at 60. Why? Because a real dev team with actual experience, would first have to fix everything the last team broke. And the last team were budget nobodies, who’s sole job was to copy paste the old game with a few graphical updates. They couldn’t even manage not to mess that up.
I’d pay for more shared stash tabs… 1/3 players would… in a loot-oriented game.
Poe offered this 15 years ago and are still running hot. I wonder why that’s a feature in theirs and not in d2r… Oh, that’s right. They’d have to deliver on other previously mentioned promises and that spooks the hell out of them xD.
1 Like
I am not in the habit of paying a second time for something i already have (with the exception of d2r for console aswell) but the only thing i would pay for is 1.09. Anything pre 1.10 really, online server with d2r QoL and graphics. I find it increadibly unlikely anything new coming from this company will be an upgrade so better to go back in time.
2 Likes
Only if it has more mercs against more immunes to slow down the pace of the game.
I prefere some end game like Rifts and scoreborads.
Lord of Destruction already permanently damaged the game in 2001, IMO.
Let’s not have further incompetent developers release an unholy DLC.
1 Like
Yea we would love to get more content for D2R…but to be honest i prefer Quality over Quantity.
If i had a project and it still had flaws…i would not add new content on the same product if there is still issues from other aspects. I would fix first the current issues before i adress new ones.
1 Like
Totally agree, but some player want more and more content by risking to make it worse, stupid content or even trying to solve problems by implementing other problems.
I just wish they would get rid of bots, make the chat work properly and fix stupid bugs.
1 Like
Some of them are bobs and they have no clue what they want. But in these days the amount of crap gets released is huge and i dont get it really. They should focus really on the qualitys and some of these kids should also prefer better game mechanics are added or lets say fixed.