Can someone explain this ban?

I resubbed Jan 2025 and on Feb 26 2025 i got a 7 day ban for being toxic which i get i was. But i also know blizzard should and has the easy ability to review all my chat from character creation to that ban to review all and any chat i commited before giving me that punishment right?

So then i get unbanned march 5th and on march 7th banned again for chat i also did before feb 26th ban. How is that plausible? I already got punished 7 days for my chat from January resub to feb 26th how can i get duplication punishment again? If i reformed after my feb 26 to march 5th ban. What sense is there to go back to the past and ban me again? In the USA thats called double jeapordy and ia not legal?

My best guess is that there were many reports for repeated infractions over the course of the month. The moderators got to the some of the early ones, applied the suspension, then a couple weeks later came to the later ones and applied a suspension specifically for those.

Double jeopardy prevents being tried by the government in court of law for the same crime twice.

This is not a court of law, Bliz is not the government, and like I surmised above it may not be for the same infraction.

I mean its not my fault Blizzard has the tools to review my chat for February and failed to do so before issuing a 7 day ban. Then issuing a seperate 10 day ban. Unless one chat was more severe than the other and warranted longer but then it only makes sense to add the extra days on a ban such as 7 + 3 = 10.

This only makes sense if the severity of the missed report should have been 17 days total but that is a very strange amount of time for a single chat ban infraction.

So getting a seperate 7 and a seperate 10 makes no sense in this situation. Surely you have to see my side and understand it to an extent. Otherwise lets say you had a bad week trolled 3 people then simultaneously receive 3 increasing bans back to back to back.

No video game company does that, it is not logical or practical.

99% of game companies when it comes to being toxic don’t punish per specific instance but based on your last ban. As in league i had a bad week i trolled 3 games finally got reported. Riot games sees all 3 of those games as long as they are in the same realm as toxic ie calling someone a noob vs racial violent slurs and threats.

Assuming all 3 in the same category they add up the punishment and give 1 ban. Once the ban falls off starting then thats it time for reform. They don’t ban 1 game wait for it to fall off ban again, ect…

That would go against what chat behavior reform bans are for. And thats for moments or instances of behavior to let you know hey recently you’ve been toxic lets change that behavior going forward now that your aware of it.

Doing it the way blizzard did with me is not correct or proper in any sense of gaming standards.

Its also because being toxic can be subjective that outside of the obvious we might not be aware that we are and thats why toxicity reports and bans are handled that way to bring awareness and starting from that time to fix our behavior going forward.

But by the time we realize our behavior is wrong we might have pissed off even 4 different people in a week without knowing it was against TOS blizzard should ban it as 1 instance not 4 back to back bans which would be ludicrous.

Otherwise where do you draw the line of treating behavior as 1 instance instead of as a collective? 1 minut, 1 hour, 1 week, one battle ground, 1 raid, 1 dungeon, based on how many you pissed off? Same topic? See how many ways you can blur the lines here? That’s why all companies go based on how I have mentioned above, see you being toxic, add it all up give you a warning why and what you did so you don’t do it again. Give you 1 collected ban and hope you can reform.

Any other way just is not a correct method and no one would agree with you that it is

You seemed to have missed my use of the word “guess” in my very first sentence, ShimoriS.

With that sorted, the forums are not the place to discuss disciplinary actions. In fact, it’s not allowed. If you think there was an error, your only recourse it to submit an appeal ticket to have the situation looked over again by the moderation team.