As far as I know they charge you 5 bucks for the service, you need to own the games in order to acces them. And what people are complaining is that GFN was the only way they could play. Others purchased the game hoping they could play it in GFN. And right now Activision-Blizzard have been doing really bad stuff. The WC3 horrible cash grab, the Hong Kong stuff. Theres like absolutelly no reason no to let their games on the platform
hey blizzard do u think suport for mac ?
you always have the option to sue them in court blizz loves law suits haha
Does this mean you can’t play any Blizzard games on Geforce graphics? Im not real sure what the other stuff means.
GeForce Now is a cloud service that allows people to play selected video games on Nvidia’s servers. During the beta of GeForce Now, Blizzard games were available for play. But shortly after launch Bliz removed their games from the service. That’s all this means.
1 Like
To be honest they should put it back on the GFN because they would gain more people and maybe even money
1 Like
If Bliz’s EULA restrictions on cloud services are like they are stated then why is it on playkey and shadow which are both also cloud gaming services :C 
it’s simple.
With Shadow, you have just an empty pc, just windows and shadow stuff. you need to buy and install all your game and you are the only one who have the access. Shadow don’t have any game and you don’t share your session. it’s YOUR pc
Geforce now have all game already installed in their drives, that’s the problem, they don’t have the right to have that. if playkey is the same, it’s just a question of time if the service is popular.
it’s a bad move but that not the worst they have done 
There’s a difference between hosting the game for the players (GF Now) and renting server space that users can do what ever they want with (Shadow).
The former is a company providing a game for cloud use. To prevent EULA violations, Bliz can tell the company (Nvidia) to not provide the game.
The latter is a user personally downloading and installing what they want on a cloud service. Here, it’s up to the player to not personally violate the EULA by using the service to play Bliz games.
Have to comment. This is complete hogwash. At 5e monthly with 1,000,000,000 customers wanting the best deal for their money would be completely financially unrewarding I absolutely agree. Or even half that would put them in unthinkable poverty right?
Even if you had 1,000,000,000 customers paying 5e month for lets say access to 1000 games that would only make 1,000,000 euros for one developer. i dont think its even 1/500 develope cost of one call of duty game