I figure nobody really knows of all of them and what they did just by the nature of who writes history (or copy/pastes it as the monks often did) 
But yeah, everything is open to a bit of interpretation - unless you were there.
Now in the case of Ukraine I have a cousin there who used to be in finance in Odessa - she now is part of a drone team fighting the “orc” invaders.
Of that I am certain.
Apparently this scene was so disturbingly realistic that vets were having to get up from their seats in theatres:
Because pandering
when did we compete against elves in the Olympics? And in many settings elves are physical strength is the same - take DnD the main elf god is androgynous and dark elves females are physically stronger then men (thanks to loth)
Swedish
Amazons are totally real.
I saw an episode of Futurama with them!
That was a documentary
Uh Huh…
Who cares?
This whole post screams, “where are my manly men blizzard!”
Why is it always pandering when women get featured but never pandering when men get featured?
Why does “because pandering” always come up whenever a non-male, non-white, non-straight character or a group of characters appears?
Because it is fiction.
Human history shouldn’t factor into it. The same goes for modern politics and any other BS from the real world.
This 
Honestly, I think an all female army has a lot more interesting cultural implications than an all male army simply because our culture tends to act like “male = strong, protector, provider, and female = fragile, nurturer, submissive.” We’ve seen all male armies, we’ve seen co-ed armies, all female armies are less heard of, and the idea of women being the strong protectors is refreshing for some of us.
i think you just answered your question.
Clearly you’ve not been playing korean mmos
The bait is strong with that line, anywho popcorn anyone?
