Completely disagree. How would it be dishonorable to fight against a tyrannical leader who themselves has no honor, murders civilians (including children), and blights their own people to raise them as mindless troops? Your type of honor keeps tyrants in power.
Also, as others have mentioned, it has always been acceptable to fight against a Warchief who has lost their honor. Take Garrosh for example, an overthrow Sylvanas participated in. Now we’re supposed to pretend Sylvanas must be treated with a different standard when she crosses the line?
It’s not about liking or disliking your Warchief. It’s about your Warchief losing their honor and becoming a tyrant and a disgrace to the Horde’s values.
Others might see this differently but I don’t see it as dishonorable to work with the Alliance. Yes, often the Horde and Alliance are at odds, but the Horde has always had many enemies (the Legion, the Scourge, etc.) against which they have had to team up with the Alliance to defeat. Also, I see a dishonorable and tyrannical Warchief as a bigger threat to the Horde than the Alliance. The Alliance might look to kill you on the battle field, but a bad Warchief will rot away what it means to be a true Horde from within, spreading vile ideologies like “honor means nothing to a corpse”. If you don’t have honor you’re not Horde. Period.
I see honor much differently than you. I stand with Saurfang all the way…