Cursewords:
Do you think words are only allowed to have one definition? Are you too lazy to scroll passed the first line Google shows you?
Words can have multiple definitions and intonations.
I listed the definition of “superhuman” as it appears in both the Merriam-Webster and Cambridge dictionaries. It is there for anyone to read.
Then it’d come down to what the definition of “superhuman” is regarding cults of personality. And I still gave more evidence for my side (I even did your job for you at one point).
Cursewords:
They both back my point.
Merriam Webster defines superhuman as “exceeding normal human powers, size or capabilities “
Even the Cambridge dictionary you touted lists the definition as “having abilities greater than most people”
According to both dictionaries, Trump’s phrase of “I alone can fix it” is a superhuman claim.
See my comment above.
Cursewords:
Yes, it is telling that you are unaware of the fact that words have multiple meanings.
You read the first definition and think that is it? The lazy logic of someone who thinks Wikipedia is a good source to find a full membership roster of the Invisible Empire.
Nothing you said here disproves anything I said.
Cursewords:
That is wrong. You asked for citations when you didn’t make them. You are the hypocrite.
I didn’t even ask for your citations - so I am not a hypocrite about it. I just pointed out you were a hypocrite for asking others for citations when you did not list any, yourself.
You knew I was right, so after the fact, you lazily come up with Wikipedia links to post.
Had you not been a hypocrite to begin with, I wouldn’t have that to call out.
Nothing you said here either disproves anything I said. My points remain valid. I grow weary of your petty attempts to save face. If you reply to this, don’t quote-mine, or I’ll block you.