Are you ever going to provide the source on the tentacles thing?
Just because you’re ok with the damage already done being worse, doesn’t mean everyone else should be, or that Blizz should go along with it.
7 Likes
The point is that there is already no visual distinction, so the argument that there has to be is worthless unless you’re also asking for Void Elves to no longer have the ability to wear helmets.
Go make a Void Elf, you can clearly see that some of the hair styles have no tentacle.
6 Likes
The point should be that this is a useless spam thread when we have two others active.
6 Likes
Still dodging that bullet I see.
You spoke of tentacles “not really being physical” as if you had proof of it, mr “I care about the Lore, that’s why worgen tails shouldn’t be a thing”. I still want to see concise lore basis for that claim.
You’re right, and we all know that this guy will never be able to handle the burden of proof anyway.
5 Likes
This always bugs me on either side of this topic.
Because it almost always gets restored anyway.
3 Likes
And it’s not like we can’t tell who’s doing it…
Every time particular people show up.
Right?
They throw flags at the wall begging it to stick…
4 Likes
Excuse?
It would be appreciated if the harassment going on here came to a close.
We understand that you want to look good in front of your friends, but as I’ve mentioned we will accept you with open arms. You don’t have to hide your love for this request any longer, we are on the same side.
It’s upsetting those against the request are being so hostile, things had been quite civil.
Please stay on topic, as it’s against the forum rules to go off-topic.
We can now peacefully return to the love for blood elf hair options for void elves.
Please refrain from false flagging as well, it’s incredibly rude and uncalled for.
4 Likes
Not everyone wants this, I for sure don’t.
Also this is a spam thread made when there are already two megathreads about this exact topic going already, which I pointed out in my first post in this thread.
3 Likes
Ah, old faithful.
“It’s not the people mass flagging’s fault, it’s the people they’re harassing!”
OP is from WRA too, so this could go either way.
7 Likes
It’s never “their” fault, it’s somehow everyone else’s.
Good catch, legit, good catch because I was super confused.
5 Likes
Sure.
2 Likes
Hopefully they actually do something about the person false flagging.
1 Like
Nah, we did! I even said:
Because I never used that unique thing as an argument. 
1 Like
You are being very disingenuous with this.
Trying to compare a race designed neutral with a race that has been on the horde since BC is a false equivalence.
In saying that though, I’m all for more added to Pandaren that are faction exclusive. Give us more distinctions in our race based on faction.
11 Likes
No, it’s not a false equivalence.
People want blood elves to be visibly different from a glance from void elves.
That logic makes zero sense when Pandaren also exist and are not visibly different from a glance.
ANd it wouldn’t put Horde down one either, because void elves wouldn’t be visibly different from blood elves unless they had void-only hair. And even then, blood elves have jewelry that void elves can’t use.
3 Likes
literally the same thing lol. same exact species.
2 Likes
Only if you ignore the context of why they exist on both factions. Again introduced as neutral as a key feature, High Elves were given to the horde under Blood elves in TBC.
I can appreciate Pandaren but also value faction distinction when Blizz has said that the faction boundaries aren’t disappearing any time soon.
Pandaren have had there options as a neutral race since there inclusion, Alliance were never given, promised or entitled to having a direct 1:1 copy of a Horde race that was added in TBC.
You don’t have to take away options to value distinctions, but adding some to a already neutral race seems perfectly reasonable to me.
You are essentially asking for a Horde race to be neutral. I have a hard time believing that some wouldn’t be at least a bit miffed.
10 Likes
I love how it’s
“Void Elves are Blood Elves and Blood Elves are High Elves” when people ask for High Elves.
But “You are not Blood/High Elves, you’re Void Elves” when people want more normal hairstyles.
Which is it, are we blood elves or not?
You can’t even make up your mind.
9 Likes
As per Wikipedia:
False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning.
You are pitting a race that has had its place within an specific faction for 15 years, to one that was especifcially introduced with neutrality as its hook and that still is capable to pick a side.
It absolutely is a false equivalence.
Sure you can compare them all you want, but you can also compare a cherry to a watermelon because they’re both round, and in neither case you’d be correct.
But what really matters is that she would get the pretty elves. Who cares if other people doesn’t like it.
I suggest you do the unlocking scenario for Void Elves. All the info it’s right there.
7 Likes