Uh oh. Blizz just got called out

Community General Discussion
93

Oh no! SPAM!!!

Stop advertising your videos, OP.

94

A shill? No, we got that about fifteen posts ago.

Thought you said “prawn” at first. It was a lot funnier that way.

2 Likes
95

I have my doubts because I specifically remember a 4chan post on I think /b/ that was almost just like this story about 2 maybe 3 years ago. It could just be a coincidence though

96

Very cool and reliable place.

1 Like
97

Yeah. I just find it funny that all these channels that do this never seem to post anything positive about anything game related and tend to focus on the negative parts.

98

I love GD. People reposting videos about people going over reddit and twitter posts.

2 Likes
100

Your commitment to the bit is admirable honestly.

2 Likes
101

I don’t feel sorry for this guy. He was weak, he let Gemma walk all over him and instead of manning up he had panic attacks. Gemma took her ****, laid it on the table and it turns out it was bigger than his. She won. It’s no wonder she got a promotion, this is what corporations want, cut throat, ruthless people who will do anything for a higher pay check.
This guy should’ve figured out a better way to get Gemma fired.

102

This ain’t it, chief.

1 Like
103

You must be self employed. Use that terminology in an office setting today and tell me how that turns out.

3 Likes
104

How D:

/10char

105

But that link will lead to clicks that’ll bring in that sweet, sweet Youtube ad revenue. Because the Adpocalypse and Youtube’s bonkers algorithm really causes content creators to do what they need for those clicks.

107

Kinda ironic how in one case we’re supposed to believe the accuser not matter how many witnesses step forward and says shes lying.
then in another case we’re suppose to just assume that the accused is guiltless.

I prefer facts, personally.

1 Like
108

That doesn’t help

109

with that mask you can live rent-free here

111

I really hate to break it to you dorks on here who believe every instance of someone making a claim about something can only be taken as valid if they submit to you personally video and audio evidence and 5 eyewitnesses who were all within 5 feet of the occurrence and have never lied in their life…

But you don’t even need evidence like that in a court of law under many circumstances. There are other ways besides Dorko McLogic’s Burden of Proof to get to the most likely occurrence.

This is my only serious post about this because I am objectively correct.

112

if the post is less than 10 characters, make a new line and use < > and type something in that. it will hide the words inside them

1 Like
113

<Like this?>

Edit: I still see it. I’m a newb at forum stuff

114

almost. below, not above

1 Like