i’m really interested in your apparent belief that it’s more realistic for Gneusch to create (at the time of writing) seven different accounts, collect different pets and mounts on each account then grind out - at a glance - 20k achievements on at least two of them, 33k achievement points on at least one of them, and 40k achievement points on another all just to like his own mildly critical comments of your posts rather than accept seven different people happened to agree with his point.
2 Likes
And what makes anyone think your “criticism” is worth consideration? Not that you actually gave any. One would at least think there would at least be a feeble attempt at it.
You had thoughts which perhaps may be significant for you, but really isn’t considering the currently evolved state of the human race. That does not mean they were worth the cyber bits they are saved on posting.
This is an implied question that exists for any comment, including your comment you just did.
What makes anyone think your comment you just did is worth consideration?
But answering your question, the fact that I’ve known Warcraft for longer than many devs is already a good start to considering my opinion valid.
Here’s my stab (thanks AI for editing this down):
- The story so far feels a bit predictable and low-energy. It could use more surprise or emotional weight. It’s just not that interesting.
- The heavy focus on dwarves feels disconnected from the larger themes of the expansion. It’s not clear why they’re central to the plot.
- With recent patches moving us to places like Undermine and now involving ethereals, Khaz Algar no longer feels like the core of the expansion. That weakens the sense of focus.
- The destruction of Dalaran didn’t land emotionally. The event felt rushed, and the follow-up quests didn’t make it feel meaningful or earned.
- There’s just too much going on. The game feels overloaded with systems and content that compete for attention instead of working together.
- Many of the micro-events and time-limited features feel like FOMO traps. These make the game feel stressful instead of fun. More lasting, high-quality content would be better than constant busywork.
3 Likes
Undermine were good in this regard, Karesh seems good too
But this is 100% true about TWW launch content.
I’ve lived in a house for 30 years, does that mean I know more about building houses than a professional carpenter or brick-layer?
Nowhere in your post did you actually state what you liked or didn’t like about these two different stages of TWW. You just stated a broad opinion. Other posters are criticizing you because no where did you provide any constructive commentary on what aspects you liked or didn’t like; that could be used to improve the game.
Then you went on to attack people.
Like, do you just not like spiders? But you like goblins? Is that why?
1 Like
Its not a rule, but it could be the case.
exceptionally if the houses built by this professional are colorful and made of weak materials.
About undermine, everything.
About Karesh? i did state.
Yep guys… the more colorful the house is the more of an expert carpenter Broxikor will become.
Dude, the guy was just trying to point you in the right direction of why your post was not “constructive”. Then you attacked him. Are your projecting? I feel like you are stating this because the criticism you received is making you feel insecure. So you are turning this into “you weak… me strong”.
Anyways, I’m checking out of this thread. Not really any discussion happening here. The words just go in one ear and out the other. “TWW Karesh BAD”, “TWW Undermine GOOD”, got it guys. Lets just make all future expansions inside the Undermine and OP will love them.
1 Like
Whats with the hatred of Murrpray? Shes literally just a random dungeon boss in terms of story importance.
Being passive-agressive trash talker is not how to do that.
By definition my post is a constructive criticism.
Even if i just said " DF is a bad content but TWW is a good content" this is by definition a constructive criticism, its not technical, its extremely simple and vague,
but the fact that it is vague is not the variable of what makes something feedback or not.
This is what a group of self-liking bots are, they must do that to compensate the lack of substance.
Literally no one said that, you didn’t even read, you are just backing your buddy, predictable
Forum staff flagging as “Inappropriate/Trolling/Misconduct”, mark for deletion in 3…2…1
If they had to quote what they flag it would be funny.
you should have wrote (In my opinion) instead of (constructive criticism) so these edgy nerds wouldnt troll/argue/flame you into oblivion…
and even then sharing your opinion here is like walking into a mine field instead of explosions you get monkeys and unemployed clowns throwing excrements at you
Edit: just like the one below me, great example
2 Likes
Dude, if English isn’t your primary language, stop arguing. You are wrong. You keep saying “by definition” and you are wrong.
They would be acting just the same, theres no reason to not write constructive criticism if it is.
Projecting much?
They actually played it safe because I believe saying opinion would have made it worse 
1 Like
Well he did say this:
I wonder why people are used to say forums has only negative threads, because thats what happen when you try to say what you like about the game.