This is TBC 58-70 not classic

I have absolutely no idea why people are mad at boosts. They’re in retail aren’t they? Have been for ages? What’s the difference? #1 I’m playing a pally so I’m leveling from level 1, but I’ve also played this game for 17 years and have NUMEROUS max level characters throughout the years and if I wanna spend money to save time on one of them then who the hell are yall to be mad about it? So confusing.

8 Likes

see you in the arenas, crop

JK, mmr system will not allow me to queue into gutter leagues where you will be hanging out :slight_smile:

You’ve never been above 2k rating in your life. Just stop.

4 Likes

Here is the reason:

Now let me break it down for you:

  1. I don’t want classic to turn into retail

  2. I don’t want retail players flooding classic

  3. The leveling experience in classic is sacred and should not be trivialized

9 Likes

I’m off guys , have fun in outlands, wish I had the free time to play with ya. I was a arena master back in the day, near glad , beat heroic raid modes… but let me tell you something it did nothing for me in life

1 Like

queue up, crop

we can tell

1 Like

You’ve had since August 2019 to level a character instead of swiping your credit card

No sympathy for retail whales

6 Likes

No, selfish, entitled players are not Blizzard’s fault. The behavior the OP is describing is accurate, and it’s really unfortunate that so many people feel it’s okay.

1 Like

Just a heads up man, you pay 15$ for a 15 year old game… who’s the whale…

If only I invested that’s sub money 10-15 years ago on bit coin

Tbc is an expansion to the base game… therefor tbc encompasses 1-70… why did blizzard go back and redo tons of quests… add whole quest hubs… buffed quest rewards…

In cata when blizz revamped the old world it was considered cata content not vanilla content. Blood elves and dreanei + new quest hubs/quests + new rewards = tbc content.

Not saying I’m for or against boosts… just that it’s irrelevant to the fact that tbc is 1-70

4 Likes

DBM existed in Original TBC.
GDKP existed in Original TBC.
Mage & Paladin boosting existed in Original TBC
Questie existed in Original TBC
RWT? Im guessing you mean RMT (real money transfer) has existed since vanilla WOW. (RMT is the only bad thing on this list & blizzard should do a lot better job enforcing their TOS regarding it)

3 Likes

vanilla / TBC always had a subscription fee

they did NOT have the ability to swipe your credit card to level up your character

It’s sad watching you retail whales bend over backwards to defend money-grubbing Blizzard’s desecration and defilement of this game

5 Likes

This is TBC, not Classic. None of your concerns are an issue on Classic servers.

because if they started at level 58 the people demanding “#nochanges” would just complain even harder

people who whinge about 1 time shop boosts, also endorse getting boosted by prot pallys or mages… soo just ignore them.

Correct. They’re fine with boosting, as long as you’re using gold not dollars.

This is a terrible idea, but yes.

TBCC is not 58-70. It’s only 58-70 for one character if you pay Blizzard cold hard cash. Anything beyond that is 1-70. This argument just doesn’t work.

1 Like

Tbc is 58-70, idk why this is even debated atm.

But the way it worked is you normally have to play through classic in order to hit tbc content.

The boost is just there to skip classic content.

You can disagree or agree whether this is a good thing or not, but 1-58 is 100% not tbc.

My point is more that the given excuse of “TBC Classic starts at 58” is BS.

Either every character starts at 58 or they clearly meant “TBC Classic starts at 58 once when you pay us $40”.

1 Like