This is a forum about adding dual spec and you ask how it’s relevant?
You’re a garbage troll.
I said that an argument that a change benefits everyone is not a relevant argument here. Many changes could benefit everyone . . . but that has nothing to do with whether or not the change benefits THE GAME.
If we are doing all this changes at least give us dual spec… it will be the best change.
1 Like
Dual Spec is not a retail change.
2 Likes
Yes partner it is. It was never in TBC. It came later. You might get it later if Blizz does a WotLK Classic version.
1 Like
No one every said that and it’s just not true. Wanting dual spec doesn’t mean people want every single other change that’s happened between TBC and Shadowlands. Stop making these ridiculous assumptions when there is absolutely no objective data to support them.
Then don’t play TBC when it re-launches and you can stay in Classic. Also why does it matter to you so much how anyone else plays the game? You get to choose how you play and not how everyone else plays.
1 Like
The economy doesnt benefit when you remove a major gold sink.
One of the things I most look forward to in TBC is low gold cost for endgame. If you remove enough gold sinks that wont happen. Everyone will just accumulate more and more gold until items/consumables go from 5-10g to 30-50g because people have nothing like respecs to spend their gold on.
1 Like
+1 for dual spec! since they going to throw changes at the arena stuff…might as well add this in
Dual spec can be impletement as a subscription, like 300g per month.
Fair compromise, ngl. One-time purchase of 1,000g would also be reasonable.
If they’re going to break Arenas then I demand dual spec
This isn’t a gold sink. This is a hiccup for the majority of players and a limiting factor for the minority (players with little gold)
Blizz has tried to implement gold sinks and none of them worked. Stop pretending this is about the economy
It’s a textbook definition of a gold sink. You cant just pretend its not because it doesnt suit your argument.
3 Likes
It’s not. It doesn’t match the criteria and don’t just toss out common terms to make it fit your absence of an argument.
Morons in this thread.
You want to have a crap time being miserable? Be my guest.
Morons.
Dual Spec is not a retail change. There is no Dual Spec in retail WoW. WoTLK is not retail WoW.
pally changes-check
arena changes-check
boosting-check
layering-check
this isn’t bc anymore. just add Dual spec already
2 Likes
Honestly, the Arena changes are bigger than Dual Spec. TBC never had rating requirements on Helm, Chest and Leg armor slots. TBC never had rating requirements on any S1 or S2 gear.
Dual Spec gives everyone a chance to play more of their class. The Arena changes actually remove the likelihood for hundreds of thousands of people to obtain current Gladiator gear in those slots.
The community wants Dual Spec.
You cannot be against dual spec and for it a little later. either it ruins the game or doesn’t.
I think you meant to say “ME” and not “THE GAME”. What metric do you have to measure the benefit of the game? You want everyone to play the game how you think it should be played. Don’t speak for the game, the dev team, or any other aspect of the game.
I am convinced the anti-dualspeccers returned their stimulus checks because they were concerned about inflation and they didn’t “earn it”.
This make me chuckle lol