Who knows, the Exploring Series has for the most part not been interested in making making major changes to the world. Although the few times it does so(like learning that Southshore is rebuilt/the Kun-Lai villages that sided with the factions are destroyed) was always interesting.
While that is interesting, the Scarlet Onslaughtâs continued existence is not interesting. It is a plot hole that preys on fan nostalgia to hide bad writing.
Hey youâre the one who brought up how âno other religion would be depicted like thisâ not me, its not a plothole, anyone can claim to be apart of an organisation thatâs how they work
Except they arenât one and the same; hell, the Onslaught have Death Knights in their ranks of all things. Even the OG Scarlets never did that.
As I mentioned, going back to Northrend means we will likely have further opportunities to deal with them. I would rather see Onslaught Harbors final destruction ingame rather then be a footnote in a book.
Look, considering both groups were lead by a dreadlord(and whatever this current incarnation is probably is as well) I donât think the Scarlet Crusade wouldnât have invited Death knights to their cause if not present the opportunity so much so as there probably were not enough death knights/Balnazzar just wasnât as clever/powerful enough to get them to join the EK ones.
The fact remains you are the one who brought it up in this thread and ignored the lore facts I presented.
imo that makes it an even greater poetic justice for Death Knights to be the ones to kill off the Scarlet Crusade.
âI wonder if itâd help if the writers made a WoW version of ISIS or the TalibanâŚâ
Oh so you didnât say this then
There is no lore reason why there canât be a scarlet crusade, Just saying âevery member of the crusade was killed in northrendâ means nothing cause anyone can just say they are also the scarlet crusade
That wasnât an accusation, and that still doesnât make me wrong about the plot holes (among other things).
There never has been any plot holes
No, youâre ignoring them because you donât want the Scarlet Crusade to be killed off permanently.
What does that even mean, if anyone can claim to be a member of an org then no org can be killed of permanently
I mean you donât want them killed off in a way that results in them no longer being in the story.
Mate, all it takes for someone to claim to be a scarlet crusader is to have the cahones to claim to be one, there is no killing them off permanetly. The only deciding factor is if blizzard decides if someone has those cahones
Even if what you said is true, it doesnât make me wrong about you not wanting them gone or why.
Except itâs not true, because thereâs a strict criterion for being a member of the Scarlet Crusade;
- Want to reclaim Lorderaen for itâs living human inhabitants.
- Worship the Light.
- Be human.
Something tells me an Orc warlock in Durotar claiming theyâre a member of the Scarlet Crusade doesnât count.
well 1. you donât get to decide how i feel about something or why i do, 2. they are an enemy related to the forsaken narratively so i like them being an enemy
and funnily enough no orc warlocks are claiming that, they all seem to be wanting to do first 2 points funny that
The Plot Threads on the Scarlet Brotherhood mention only an Arathi claiming to be heir to Terenasâs Throne through Caliaâs Bloodline. Itâs only the association with Calia that makes people think the Twilightâs Hammer is involved.
Arathi are in Hallowfall with some members being Evil while others are GoodâŚ
The Arathi want Lordaeron and the rest of the Human Kingdoms⌠The ones in Hallowfall didnât give up their claim to the Human Kingdoms like the ones in Stormwind it seems and will forge a relationship with Calia to get LordaeronâŚ
Donât be obtuse, I was pointing out how your claim
is wrong, because orgs have a strict criterion on what it means to be one.
No you werenât because its not wrong, anyone can claim to be a member of it, they just wont be taken as seriously if they arenât a light worshipping human who wants lordaeron