I didn’t fail. You read only enough to reply, with zero consideration to anything besides seeking to validate your own opinion.
You like Vanilla, you somehow think one button rotations are more engaging than temporary power boosts, and you don’t see how leaning on carries from consumes or other more viable classes is just as much borrowed power as learning on gear that’ll be gone in a year.
You’re allowed to have those opinions, and someone else is allowed to think that’s the biggest load of barnacles they will read this calendar year. There’s no winner or loser in that.
The loser is the one who refutes all points made to the contrary with personal bias. When someone uses examples, you claim deflection. When you use examples, you claim structured argument.
Not to make this about character, but at this point you’re just coming off as generally uneducated but with a dictionary nearby to misuse big words.