This is an unusual megathread since we aren’t asking for anything, but rather it is a discussion about why we shouldn’t jump to conclusions when it comes to suspecting something will be an allied race.
A common thing I see among AR groups is to point to specific pieces of perceived evidence in game and conclude that they mean that such and such allied race will happen. I am of the mentality that we should never be so quick to assume what may be an allied or not even if it seems like there is sure fire evidence that a race will be an AR. Especially so early in the expansion. Here are some common things people point to as evidence for ARS becoming playable and I will show you why they really aren’t guaranteed proof of anything:
1. Work done on models as an indicator/geosets.
During legion, many people assumed we would get Vykrul as an allied race for alliance because they had lore that might support them becoming an allied race for the alliance and goesets to use armor. We ended up getting Kul’tirans instead. There could be new races, content models added that we haven’t seen before.
2. Exist lore connecting races to factions.
As before. New races and lore is bound to happen. Especially since we don’t know what is in store for the next expansion. Plus often time faction loyalty is shared pretty commonly between a number of existing unplayable races.
3. Popularity/lack of popularity.
We’ve seen commonly requested races like Eredar, naga, Jinyu. We’ve also seen pandas and goblins become a race as well as fat humans. Popularity is one of those things that should never be used as an argument for why a race will or will not happen.
4. Datamined patch info on specified races.
This goes for any race. Seen it happening most with Vulpera, Gilgoblin and Mechagnome fan groups. Unless it is happening prepatch to an announced group of races, then it most likely isn’t solid proof that the race will become playable.
5. So called leaks and predictions about allied races prior to next expansion.
Most of these “leaks” I’ve found were usually just pieces of information found about an unplayable race framed as surefire or high evidence it will become likely. Most likely if there was going to be an allied race for something like 8.2.5 right now, it would already be in the PTR. Zandalari and Kul’tirans were announced about 10 months in advance before they happened. Never in one expansion has blizzard released new races mid expansion that weren’t announced prior to it.
6. Statements made at Blizzard.
Often when these questions are asked to devs at blizzard con, they may not necessarily reflect the entire body blizzard cooperates with. They can often also be easily taken out of context or they may be subject to change. Plus. It isn’t far from the truth that blizzard could stretch the truth. I wouldn’t take these are hard evidence and be very wary about statements like these. They can also often be framed out of context.
7. Work done on a race.
Vulpera and Mechagnomes supporters commonly argue this one. However this often disregards the fact that another expansion can and most likely will have entirely new races of content that may be viable candidates. Along with the possibility that other races may one day be given updated content. It is short sighted to look at this race right now and think"Wow. Because it has all this work done in it then it surely must eventually be planned as an AR right?"
The whole point here is to basically show that there is a great deal of uncertainty and we cannot be sure that a race will become an allied race based on anything right now. We can support it, but so many things are subject to change.