Thank you for covering Alexstraza up

:wink:

It is not, take Sylvanas for example, her first two models were pretty covered but we got belly Sylvanas. Even now people still complain about her being covered up but forget that she started out that way. Also I was talking about player clothing as well, there are many old sets where the design is more exposed on female players. I am still salty about some of the MoP pants. I really wanted a black pair that I could use for transmog, instead I got panties and knee warmers.

Do you find shirtless males sexy? The way WoW does it, they are not sexy because there is nothing sexy about a shirtless guy in high waisted pants. The skimpy shorts on males are still longer than the skimpy shorts on female.

There are different types of power fantasies for men. Some of them are about being unclad in that barbarian/ berserker kind of way. But this does not matter, not every woman’s power fantasy is about being unclad but look at the gear we get. Having more options for everyone should be the goal.

It would be great to have the options to look like Barbarella or to look like Samus. I don’t want anyone to think that I want skimpy armor removed. I don’t, I just want the options/ choice to have the skimpy or modest options for people that want them.

2 Likes

I do in fact…

All of my male characters are shirtless :wink:

Thanks for being a part of the “woke” culture and telling me what I can and can’t look at. I can appreciate skin without objectifying women.

But…….

Might as well put everyone in robes head to toe because you’re sensitive. Stay woke and keep censoring everything. Without the context of the lawsuit this wouldn’t even be discussed, that’s how fake we all know this “movement is” we should have mommy put you in a bubble so you won’t get those wittle fewwings hurt ever.

Showing skin is fine, treating women incorrectly is not. Learn how to fight the actual fight. Instead of clickbait posts like this.

7 Likes

well yea, for political reasons Alex in hots was given leggings and made thicker… that’s not really a decent argument, that’s arguing with oneself…
And before we go off with personal insults, I truly don’t care what Alex looks like, in fact I like the leaked artwork, it looks like she donned some battle armor to defend her xpac. I just know they will destroy her personality and character as per wow’s track record with classic characters.

I am gunna need a long sock

You do know it is not “woke” culture telling you want you can and can’t look at but some of the women showing skin that don’t like your “appreciation” of it. You have already objectified them if you cannot realize they don’t like you looking or you dismiss their feelings as “woke” culture.

1 Like

It will never stop amusing me that people insist women being covered up is a woke culture thing when it’s the US is a prudish country due to its religious roots.

3 Likes

If it makes them uncomfortable why would they wear it? Serious question.

It absolutely is the woke culture trying to control things like this what are you talking about?

And you trying to tell me that if someone admires a woman’s beauty they are objectifying them is such a grabbing of straws argument.

Granted some bad apples spoil the bunch…

Not everyone is a pervert. You can appreciate appearances without making them feel uncomfortable. A woman that dresses nice and receives a compliment that’s warranted is one thing. Creepily hitting on them is another.

Know the difference.

Bikinis are ok. Men coming up to a women in a bikini creeping them out is not. Quit acting like a sensitive child it’s getting old.

6 Likes

“Woke” is a conservative bogeyman and a completely meaningless word at this point.

4 Likes

What do you wanna call it then? Cover everything up in robes cause a few bad men weren’t raised correctly movement?

1 Like

It is absolutely woke culture telling the general public what we can and cannot look at. Newsflash, unless you are legally blind, you will see things with your eyeballs. Using my god given sense of sight is not an attack on you. As long as you are in my area of vision, you will be seen whether you’re attractive, unattractive, dolled up or frumped down. So let’s not use the gift of sight as a scapegoat or whatever. Stop strawmanning, seek help, or grow up, whichever is applicable.

7 Likes

Since nobody has been covered up in robes, I guess you could call it a troll thread and move on.

Why did they have to cover her up when she was already smuggling grapefruits? She already had fruits!

1 Like

Why did you wear what you have on?

Ah, so you are the creepy looker, got it. You don’t have to come up to a woman to be a creeper. There are many women of all ages, backgrounds, beliefs, and political leaning that will tell you that. Bless your little sensitive heart.

There’s a difference between looking and staring. Anyone who has been objectified or “undressed with someones eyes” probably knows “that look”.

Black scrubs, a lab coat, and Nike cross trainers? Because I work in a lab and am on my feet alot. Need some comfy kicks.

Doesn’t really answer my question though. Please explain.

1 Like

It is kinda funny, troll thread or not

People get mad when women aren’t blatantly objectified

All the other dragons wearing full robes or plate armor, but her having her cheeks out is super important

2 Likes

As much as that is a thing that occurs amongst unsavoury folks in the real world, it does not apply to Alexstrasza or any of our characters.

I personally don’t get hung up on what video game characters wear. Fantasy is a broad term.

Fortunately, Alexstrasza isn’t real so she doesn’t actually have to deal with that. But people are attracted to video game characters. That’s fine I guess, I can’t really touch on that subject.

Video game characters get visual updates all the time, I don’t see this as anything different. If players can transmog on a whim, why can’t an NPC?

3 Likes