Teldrassil's burning was a short-sighted decision on the writers' part

Yeah, they were really fixated on comparisons to the Red Wedding, so I’d say that was in their minds for sure. But what I still wonder about … Hmm, this is hard to put into words …

So, the reason they thought the Red Wedding was cool and wanted to “make their own” was tied up with people’s reactions to it—their own reactions, if no one else’s. The reason they even wanted to recreate the Red Wedding was because they wanted to recreate some kind of ideal reaction from those who experienced it. So, what was the reaction they were envisioning, and why did they think the burning of Teldrassil would create it?

There was this quote from Ion Hazzikostas:

https://www.pcgamer.com/wows-game-director-responds-to-battle-for-azeroths-elf-genocide-drama-and-rocky-pre-patch/

“I mean… think back to the internet the evening after the Red Wedding episode of Game of Thrones aired. How many people were like, ‘I’m done with this. I’m never watching this show again! I don’t understand how they could do this?’ It’s because they just watched something they had an emotional investment in struck down before their eyes. That’s part of good storytelling.”

It sounds like he thinks nobody actually quit watching GoT because of the Red Wedding–that the emotional investment drove them to say that in the heat of the moment, but that they actually came right back desperate to know what happened next, because they just couldn’t simply walk away. And he might be right about GoT, but does he really not see the difference between watching the death of some characters you might love and being made to feel personally responsible for the destruction of a beautiful city? (Either because you failed to save it—an experience they went out of their way to create—or because you attacked it with no reason except “My leader said to.”)

23 Likes