You’re the only one acting this way, here. Defensive and aggressive, with nothing mature or relevant to say. Seriously, go back and check. You’re projecting, and that’s something that can generally be controlled with a deep breath and a clearing of the mind.
Also, as I’ve begged of you more than once, READ THE THREAD.
That’s a direct answer to your question, albeit with a different person as the subject. Same thing, though.
Here’s another person that answered you already:
So, the unambiguous answer is “no.” I certainly wouldn’t, and I don’t think the other poster would, find it acceptable to cast an actor of Nigerian descent (Freeman) in the role of a person of Welsh descent (Davis), in a historically accurate movie about the President of the Confederacy. That’s ridiculous, and you know it.
But we aren’t talking about a war biopic here, are we? We are talking about a Disney cartoon. In a Disney cartoon, the “race” (of a mermaid?!?!) and/or skin color is inconsequential.
If you want to argue purity of art, “staying true to the original,” etc., then where’s your thread on the lack of hand-drawn animation in modern films? It’s all CG these days; hand-drawn art in films is all but a memory, which is quite a travesty. That’s an actual art form that is becoming lost.
That argument is far more worthy of discussion than colors of characters.