If that were so, then build diversity wouldn’t exist at all. 
Also objectively incorrect. Giving feedback on very specific parts of a build or ability within the class-spec after controlled tests is very productive. Case in point:
We will never know what wild methodology Blizzard uses, but my experiment effectively tested the same thing: steady-state damage.
- And I arrived to the same conclusion Blizzard did, so you cannot claim it was not a productive test. I pointed out an area that needed attention, and Blizzard reached the same conclusion.
I don’t know because I never did a test without pets. What does that have to do with the test I already conducted?
You wouldn’t happen to be pivoting, would you? Moving a goalpost, perhaps? 