Yeah that happened after I made this thread. Locks may be the best.
Who will clap the most cheeks? Warrior or Warlock?
Place your bets.
Wah wah
/10
Wait people care about DPS meters for raids that are clearable with half of the raid size? Why tho?
Define āviableā.
Good thing thereās no links to these, so thereās no evidence.
So I seen a Sim that showed Melee Survival Hunter with a 900 something average DPS and a 1100 max DPS. Of course thatās assuming Dual Wield Spec and Melee Specialization both release this phase.
well needed. Good change.
High enough dmg they arenāt hurting the raid.
Who cares who is the top dps in PvE as long as the boss drops and people get loot. You donāt get extra shiit for topping meters other than a slightly bigger epeen.
The real problem is warriors will be wrecking in PvP too.
The only people that care are try hards that take classic, a very casual game, far too seriously.
Isnt there a thread by the same guy now talking about how fire locks are gonna be #1?
Honestly, this is Blizzards fault for giving them % Damage/AP scaling abilities for a class that scales extremely well.
Who doesnt want to be the best
got to keep those warrio-babies coddled at all times, ya know?
who cares on a raid most pugs will be clearing in under an hour anyway. pvp is where the real imbalances show.
this isnt bleeding edge retail mythic raiding where a little more dps matters.
Ret paladins probably care, but nobody cares about them so itās a moot point.
Best at what though? Raid DPS doesnāt translate to how good a spec is at PvP and thatās the only relevant metric in this game. You can clear a raid designed for extremely casual gamers a bit quicker than non-meta comped out raids? Grats I guess?
Best at PVE DPS. You may not care at all about that metric, but many others do.