While I do love the idea of interacting with those characters on a racial basis, especially since so many were taken from us too soon, it seems a bit like the epidemy of this hyper-focus on hero characters which steal the story from the player that people have been criticizing for a long time.
Also, “they’re legends in comparison to us”? Even a player who only does quests and not any dungeons or raids has way more impressive feats than any of those guys.
Some of those are a bit too much of a stretch. Arthas as a hero? And for just an allied race? Putress instead of Kel’Thuzzad? How is Maraad an option when he died on a different planet in a different timeline? Also, wouldn’t Kael’Thas being fel corrupted be an issue?
Arthas being a hero just sounds absolutely awful tbh.
Can’t see the Undead work with Putress since he was a pawn of the Burning Legion. That would be like the Orc hero being Guldan (not that I don’t know a few warlock mains who would be fine with that.)
Which Dranosh Saurfang are they talking about? MU was dead before WoD happened and AU was probably never born since Varok Saurfang died early on against the Lightbound in AU.
Only if they aren’t making so Wrathgate was Sylvanas’ doing.
Also aside from a few minor named Dark Rangers and the Desolate Council, who do the forsaken have to draw upon for this? Galen Trollbane?
Also given the Mag’har they are using is the AU Mag’har then wouldn’t AU Durotan or AU Drakka been the better choices?
Also given how much the Void Elves have been getting random stuff (Broken rep?) to be balanced to the rest of the allied races them just getting a random raid boss who had a void theme seems appropriate sadly enough.
AU Drakka was still alive and manning a garrison when the recruitment scenario happened. I could see them using Dranosh for the AU Mag’har for two reasons: for a storyline to get Geya’rah to cool it with the “If it speaks Eredun it’s Eredone” mindset, or because Blizzard is inept enough to not remember the split timelines.