Because you would clearly lose.
False. If I wanted to pick a fight I would trash talk.
I don’t need to tell myself anything. Infact multiple people have literally agreed with me.
It’s funny how you make claims and then when I ask for actual proof you then decide you don’t want to respond.
It’s clear to anyone you made false claims and then were called out on it.
Good luck trying to save face 
It’s not a lie. There is going to be a distinction between forms because of the reasons I already stated.
Now you’re making an assumption.
There isn’t going to be a conversation on compromise. There isn’t going to be a compromise in the distinction between forms.
I’m not going to argue with someone whose only goal is to argue, goodnight sir good luck in your search for forum pvp.
Back in Vanilla, it made sense for Shadow Form to be an activated ability because there was actually a functional reason why you might turn it off–eg, to be able to cast your healing spells. But now that it’s basically just a passive bonus with no downside (other than the aesthetics), I’m not sure why it even still exists. The 10% shadow damage bonus should just be baked into the spec at level 10, and then Voidform should be the new Shadow Form.
How do you know what my goals are? All you have done is throw tantrums and retort with assumptions.
None of them are passive abilities of a form/stance that someone could theoretically have 100% uptime in.
Did you just assume that I thought health and castbars didn’t follow the player? Really. If health bars functioned exactly like they do now, were if they’re in your immediate view they float over the player’s position, then what the character looks like holds little bearing on how you react. Unless you don’t use castbars for some reason.
Because if what you say is true, 3/4 of characters you play against would end up confusing you. Like Monks. All three specs can use the same weapon. Until they start doing anything you won’t know what to expect. Unless you’re like every other PvPer out there and do a quick inspect/assumption about their composition before the match starts.
I’m going to say this as nicely as possible. You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.
It’s an talking about a FORM not a spec. There is a visual distinction between boomkin and caster forms.
I’m not looking at someone to determine their spec. That’s what gladius is for. I’m looking for visuals to determine cc chains
When arms warriors are in defensive stance there are four shields that rotate in a circle.
Again your lack of understanding what boomkin form even does is showing.
not a great bussiness model.
are you ion Hasiotises btw?
But they dont have to use a glyph like this if they dislike it.
PVP should in no way be taken into account when it comes to decisions in a PVE game. Just disable the glyph in PVP and stop using pvp as an excuse to limit choices in a PVE game.
Because millions of people are leaving because of boomkin form? Loool.
No.
Hate to break it to you but pvp is one of the three main pillars of endgame.
That means you are actually wrong.
either way stil should train your brain to look at their buffs not their body.
Obviously not. Don’t bad faith.
It’s because of that attitude from the devs over-all. That dissuade players from enjoying the game.
99.9% sure he’d say that so nothing proven.
quoting devs who said as much. PVP was an afterthought, and some devs said they wish theyd never introduced it.
Why I would I waste time looking at buffs when there is a very obvious visual que?
Have you ever broken 1500?
If people need to rely on devs to enjoy the game they will never be happy.
I mean imagine making such a weak argument.
“Some devs” that don’t even work here anymore.
PVP is a main pillar of the game so you are still wrong.
God i wish i could be so wrong, so confidently!
Lucky for me I’m not wrong.
You quoting one dev out of context doesn’t change anything.
and your opinion doesnt change the fact that WOW is a pve game, and PVP was an afterthought.