the funny thing is, i actually use it differently! i ignore people when i know that they generally do not contribute to a conversation, and so will want to scroll past them that much more quickly when reading a thread. but there are times, as now, when the (simple and self-evident) fact that responding to posts of people i have ignored, no matter how distasteful, is sometimes worthwhile. as here, where describing this to you will hopefully help you grasp it (i tried to avoid words with more than three syllables).
anyhow, feel free to take the last word, as i will now resume my blissful ignorance of your ideas. i challenge you to write a very biting haiku, and i’ll imagine it was very clever, as a courtesy. ciao!
Huh this never happened because you read and respond to every single one of my posts. You telling me how I’m not worth replying to falls flat when you keep replying.
You also keep trying to imply I’m the one that’s one sandwich short of a picnic but I’m not the one that’s saying “I have you on ignore but I’m going to respond to you anyways. Take that!” So freaking stupid.
Anyways, I’ll be happy to show you how ignore actually works.
Americans wanted Trump back plain and simple. Harris was a terrible candidate who can’t function without a teleprompter. She lost all of the battleground state including Dearborn Michigan voters that she tried to cater to. This should be a wakeup call for Democrats, they need to return to moderate and not going far left.
The polls understatement Trump and oversample democrat voters.
1 Like