lmfao… soooo true
There will still be plenty of queues for DPS in Dungeon Finder.
There is a reason that they have incentives for tanks and healers to queue up during certain times. RDF doesn’t make roles magically appear.
Correct. Not having RDF didnt make that happen either. So if Im opting for a 45 min queue or potentially no dungeon at all, then yeah, Im gonna take 45 min queue
The 45 mins is just an estimate. Just because it’s not on a timer for BB doesn’t mean it isn’t theoretically there.
Im playing the game currently, there are times where you can either get invited to a group right away, and also there are times where Ive been in the group for 35 mins and it fell apart because the party leader lost hope in it filling. The 2nd part doesnt happen with RDF.
And that to me is more important than your immersion.
Not how it works. You couldn’t have Cata high level zones in that situation.
Effort. If you have an RDF queue and it says 55 mins and you quit at 40, you won’t get in.
Sorry you had a bad group leader. I suggest you take ownership and start your own groups to avoid this.
Wont have to when they revert their decision and the game can finally get better. Once they do revert it, do you plan on going back to Era?
1 Like
Great way to take ownership.
And no. I won’t quit because of a minor inconvenience. It’s sort of dramatic to do so, don’t you think?
Well the point would be they wouldn’t be there, it would be the map as was in Classic Vanilla. With no cata zones on them. With flying disabled as well.
No, I mean literally the wireframe models that underpin the game’s landscape would not be able to adapt. So you couldn’t have it “be reverted” because it would require two entirely different regions including where the borders of zones are etc. There’s a reason that phasing never changes the landscape, only the players and elements in that landscape.
No game I ever played implemented major, game-changing systems in response to ‘minor inconveniences’. Like it or not, I think we should all be able to agree LFD was a major, game-changing system. If you view impediments to fundamental avenues to character progression (grouping) a ‘minor inconvenience’…what in the hell do you consider a ‘major’ inconvenience? Legit curious what qualifies to you as something important.
It’s a major change.
For a minor inconvenience.
If it were not for the 58 boost in tbc pre patch, I would not be playing classic today. Maybe the 70 boost is the time to get friends in. Tbh the hundreds of hours of leveling before you can actually play the fun part of the game would turn off the vast majority of new blood. Uncapped amount of 70 boosts can’t come fast enough
1 Like
So you think game developers are in the habit of taking their time and expending company resources to create and roll out major changes for minor inconveniences? This is what you think? Can you name me another instance of that happening…in any game?
Yes.
They’re correcting those actions this time around.
LFR.
Yeah, I can’t think of any either.
Garrisons.
Thats just new content dude. Every expansion is going to have something new…kinda the purpose of having expansions. LFD was created and installed mid-expansion to address a specific problem. And if the problem was minor it wouldn’t have been done. LFD was a fix…a big fix befitting a big problem. You don’t have to like the fix but saying the problem it addressed as ‘a minor inconvenience’ is absurd to the point of likely trolling so I’m done with you…carry on sir.
It was installed at the end of an expansion.
Kind of like LFR?
It’s a minor fix from something that’s a major change. It’s unnecessary.