Removing pets from MM goes against Blizz’s stated goal of keeping the RPG in MMORPG

[Syegfryed-tol-barad (Syegfryed)]

@Quivermethis-rexxar

I wish you’d give feedback without making up definitions.

Good thing i did not made the definition, blizzard did, by saying hunters are defined by their pet:

@Kaivax

Hunters are in large part defined by their pets

@Quivermethis-rexxar

Just because hunters have always had a pet doesn’t mean it always needs to have a pet.

It does, mean that.

@Quivermethis-rexxar

Like “I want a pet because it makes sense to me” is more logical then “I want a pet because hunters are supposed to have pets”.

both of then make sense, because hunter are supposed to have pet, is part of their core fantasy

Again, confirmed by the devs.

@Quivermethis-rexxar

vs you creating your own class definition.

@Kaivax

Hunters are in large part defined by their pets

@Kaivax

our goal was to solve that problem in a way that not only reembraced pets as a part of Marksmanship’s identity

their class definition

@Oniana-lightnings-blade

It’s much better than the old way.

It isnt.

@Oniana-lightnings-blade

I am giving feedback to the change also.

You arent.