Reintroducing Ranged Survival as a fourth spec can ONLY be profitable

[Taigertraps-darkspear]

@Spinnerdh-the-underbog

Irrelevant. Hunter has also now had four specs, just like Druids. BM, MM, ranged SV and melee SV. Therefore it only makes sense that we receive a fourth spec, just like Druids did.

Or would you have preferred that Blizzard had removed all tanking elements from Feral without introducing a new fourth spec to Druids? Why do Druids get to keep their fourth spec, but not Hunters?

No it is not irrelrvant. It was a balancing nightmare at the time. And no we dont have 4 hunter specs atm. We have 3.

[Spinnerdh-the-underbog]

@Taigertraps-darkspear

No it is not irrelrvant. It was a balancing nightmare at the time.

So since it was allegedly a ‘balancing nightmare’, then Druids shouldn’t have gotten Guardian as a fourth spec? Should it just be removed now since it also requires more balancing than if it didn’t exist? Perhaps we should remove a spec from every class. That would drastically cut down on the ‘balancing nightmare’, so it can only be a good thing, right?

@Taigertraps-darkspear

And no we dont have 4 hunter specs atm. We have 3.

No, we don’t have 4 Hunter specs atm. But Hunters have had 4 specs. That’s the point. Why did Druids get to keep their 4th spec, but not Hunters? Why?