Read my Lips, NO SHARDING

[Cyberten-aegwynn]

if you actually uploaded a video of your lips moving this thread would be a lot more convincing. remember, in advertising, sex sells.

[Celessi-turalyon]

Read my lips. Not your decision.

A poster who wants numerous non vamilla QOL convenience changes, including guild banks, add-on functionality baker into classic baseline, hunters able to trap in combat(even if very briefly) also apparently wants the convenience that sharding provides.

Color me surprised.

What he wants doesn’t change the fact that it’s Blizzard’s decision, and nobody else’s. Seriously, what is with this inflated ego where all of you think that what you say goes at Blizzard? You’re nobody, just like the rest of us.

[Fesz-cenarius]

Read my lips. Not your decision.

A poster who wants numerous non vamilla QOL convenience changes, including guild banks, add-on functionality baker into classic baseline, hunters able to trap in combat(even if very briefly) also apparently wants the convenience that sharding provides.

Color me surprised.

What he wants doesn’t change the fact that it’s Blizzard’s decision, and nobody else’s. Seriously, what is with this inflated ego where all of you think that what you say goes at Blizzard? You’re nobody, just like the rest of us.

Ah, yes.

A toxic retailer who seems to want to claim that anyone desiring a truer classic experience is toxic raises her head.

Color me surprised.

[Celessi-turalyon]

Read my lips. Not your decision.

A poster who wants numerous non vamilla QOL convenience changes, including guild banks, add-on functionality baker into classic baseline, hunters able to trap in combat(even if very briefly) also apparently wants the convenience that sharding provides.

Color me surprised.

What he wants doesn’t change the fact that it’s Blizzard’s decision, and nobody else’s. Seriously, what is with this inflated ego where all of you think that what you say goes at Blizzard? You’re nobody, just like the rest of us.

Ah, yes.

A toxic retailer who seems to want to claim that anyone desiring a truer classic experience is toxic raises her head.

Color me surprised.

No, what I’m saying is toxic is people who immediately attack a post for wanting something that you don’t. Telling people they’re not welcome in the game if they don’t want it exactly how you do. Calling people trolls for wanting something that you don’t. You know what, nevermind, because in your head, it’s perfectly OK for you to act like that, but completely wrong for anyone to respond.

[Redheadchild-kul-tiras (Redheadchild)]

Wouldn’t bother replying to fesz. He likes to talk in circles and use his buzz words like “QoL convenience” because he wants us to believe a single change is evil and will lead to bfa 2.0 capped at 60.

His goal is to silence anyone with an opinion he doesn’t like.

[Ramamoosta-illidan]

No, what I’m saying is toxic is people who immediately attack a post for wanting something that you don’t.

Pretty much a lot of your posts attack people for wanting things you don’t.

[Fesz-cenarius]

Wouldn’t bother replying to fesz. He likes to talk in circles and use his buzz words like “QoL convenience” because he wants us to believe a single change is evil and will lead to bfa 2.0 capped at 60.

His goal is to silence anyone with an opinion he doesn’t like.

The last time I checked, guild banks, baking add-on functionality in baseline, allowing hunters to trap while in combat and sharding did not equate to “a single change”.

[Idun-wyrmrest-accord (Idun)]

You do realize GWB eventually put in new taxes, right? That may not have been the best quote to use…