As long as this is PvP servers only it could work. But then again, people don’t want to leave their friends, so you’re still forcing someone to play in a way that they don’t want.
Yep im gonna reply as if im on the council (so no snark) as I hope Blizz peeks out to the tbc general reads the non-council replies as they only have 3 or so representatives for this side of the game.
But I agree that this is a player made issue, but this was also an avoidable administration nightmare. This problem is when you do go all “laissez -faire” and hands off with the game, don’t moderate and things start rapidly de-stabilizing.
1 sided faction servers never should of happened. We can get layers, queues, but what about server locks? Some servers needed a lock badly during this period of free transfers as some players love ‘small’ server and community vibes (Grobbulus, mainly due to player mentality and RP) while others want population and player choices over community (Bene).
What should of been done with the free transfers was allow people to transfer, but limit the choices (if you wanna transfer to any server, pay for a normal transfer) and incentivize people to transfer to medium pop (5k players) or if theyre PVP, to go PVE than the PVP megaservers with 15k+. Especially players on the smaller faction. Servers with 15k+ players is way too huge.
But at this point I believe with the smaller servers, connections are gonna have to happen as we have more empty/dead servers than active. Leave the bigger servers alone (Bene, Grobb, Faerlina, Whitemane) and make one of the remaining 1k player servers into a connections server. Classic should of never had extra servers than the originals on launch as it was obvious that the ‘tourists’ and those who did not like the game would leave by October-November 2019. People should of weathered the queues as even with the possibility of WOTLK Classic, we wont reach that population boom like we did with Classic launch.
tl;dr: We past the point of no return for many servers. Servers/faction locks should be in now for the bigger servers. Smaller dead servers should be connected. And no matter what you do at this point, some players will be mad and get split apart if they dont act ASAP, but it’s something that cannot be avoided now.
2 Likes
I can agree with most of this.
But I don’t know that I agree here. IMO, it’s too far gone to fix. Just merge all the servers. With layering, you really don’t need more than one server of each type for each coast. For people who want smaller communities, they can leave the RP servers out of this. At this point, most people are probably willing to sacrifice server community to be able to log in a get stuff done in a timely manner. I know it’s not what this game is supposed to be about, but it’s where we are.
World pvp in tbc is a meme who cares
We log out except for one day a week and fly everywhere.
1 Like
wtf are you talking about faerlina was 60/40 like 3 monts ago blizz forced then to pay to go to bene ?
1 Like
I really like the paragraph where Aggrend talks about the 60/40 where 20% of the server population is unhappy and god-forbid they open Free transfers to those 20% because it will ruin the experience for the 80%.
This conveniently ignores that the 20% can already PAY to transfer off and ruin the experience for the 80%, and that the transfer cost is WAY less of a barrier than he seems to be implying (as proven by history).
It seems like we have 2 camps on this forum. The add restrictions to support server health crowd, and the let things freely evolve as they will crowd. Blizzards current solution which is neither properly restrictive, nor fully FREE flowing make no one happy.
Its getting painfully difficult to not look at short-term profit motives (rather than game health) being a factor here.
4 Likes
The irony…
I was on a previously healthy server which and dipped to less than 5 active players. That pretty badly affected by ability to “play the game”. I was “forced” to transfer, and ironically had to change my character name. I transferred to a server that died way faster than anyone expected, and now I’m again not able to play the game without being “forced” to transfer again.
It’s not like Blizzard didn’t have an active roll in this. They removed queues and allowed free and paid transfers to “mega” servers.
I’m not saying this is an “easy” solve, but they are already failing me and other players like me in their stated objectives.
5 Likes
I feel like the whole post was just a polite and long winded way to say “we’d rather just keep taking you money”
5 Likes
I guess they feel like, since they didn’t directly cause your problem, they didn’t “force” you to do anything and that it’s all the fault of your fellow players. And I think that’s where the problem is. If they do nothing, they can say it’s the players who made choices that may have adversely affected other players. Once they actually do something, then someone unhappy with what they do can blame Blizzard directly, and they seem to want to avoid that.
However, because of that, they’ve painted themselves into a corner. Right now, there are no actual good solutions to the problem. All Blizzard can do is pick the one that’s the least bad. IMO, the least bad solution is to connect all the realms besides the RP ones.
Blizzard’s actions since Classic launch>
1 - Underestimates the number of classic players and open fewer servers than demand;
Results in Queues;
2 - Open a random number of servers, offer free transfers;
Results in Community fragmentation;
3 - Then, add layers on original few servers to stop queues;
4 - Then let the random number of servers slowly withering, never take an action;
5 - Sells a overpriced automated character transfer ($25 where could be $1 symbolic).
Always had access to all data generated.
Players>
Simply try to play the game with no access to real data on servers, only some hints from external tools or ingame investigation.
Think again.
5 Likes
Was too much to just lock the FULL servers for months like they done before AQ /not
2 Likes
So blizzard is the semi driver on a straight road with cruise control on who sees a toddler standing in the road 100 meters down the road (plenty of time to stop) and their lawyers defense is that because they didn’t physically take any new action they are justified in their CHOICE to take no action and run the toddler over?
They can’t be perfect. I wouldn’t hold this against them
Probably better than every server having a 10k queue.
This was fine the first few months. After they removed them, they should have stayed off. Yeah, I know we got the pandemic surge, but those people should have been offered free transfers to other servers. If they had done this, we might be in a better place. This one I completely blame them for.
This is one them as well. They seem to always wait until a problem gets extreme before they do anything. Then when they do, it’s always a solution that would have been fine when people were first talking about the issue, but is now too little to really fix anything.
I’m kind of torn on this. Originally, they had to manually transfer character data from one physical server to another, so it made sense to charge. But now, it’s clearly just another source of revenue. They say it’s about “maintaining server communities”, but they don’t really do anything else it takes to to that.
While I think transfers should stay in the game, they should rework the process. How about this. You can transfer for free every six months. If you want a shorter window, you have to pay a higher price depending on how long it’s been since you last transferred. If it’s been five months, a transfer can be $10. If it’s only been a month, the transfer is $50. This would let people move, but also make it so people aren’t quite as quick to server hop.
I think the point many people are making is that if this is the approach blizzard is going to take, then all transfers should be free and unrestricted.
6 Likes
The problem with your analogy is that a truck is not a person with wants and desires of its own.
To piggy back on your analogy, it more like Blizzard is a trucking company that employs drivers and sets deadlines for deliveries. While it’s not explicitly stated that you have to break any laws to get your load to the destination by the deadline, the ones that do get there on time get bonuses, and the ones that don’t get their pay docked.
But I’m not trying to make it seem like they’re innocent here. As I said, this was all about them trying to avoid responsibility. Where we are now is what happens when you do that. They have bigger problems now than they would have if they had just set limitations from the start.
A opinion from a recently canceled sub from dying Bene horde.
All these downsides and reason presented by the Green / Blue post make 0 sense to me when the whole time this problem was happening they allow people to pay $25 per char to do what they are saying are “problems”.
I have lost my char identity every expack due to requiring a server transfer or re-roll to play on a live server or with friends.
Lets call a spade a spade, Blizzard makes to much money from transfers to make any changes. Until we speak with our wallets, this will never improve.
Seriously just look at Bene alone, in 2 months the Alli grew from 13K to 19K on the IronForge website. That could be a Max of $175,000 of almost 95%+ Margin that Activision made. The horde has gone from 5K to <2K in the same time so another $75,000. Who here would walk into their boardroom tomorrow and tell your boss “I have an idea to help improve customer moral but it will be a potential $250,000 loss in revenue year over year.”
We need to un-subscribe, it is our only option. Stand up and unite or continue the cycle.
5 Likes
No server merges, and no cross realm zones. When they turned on CRZ in current content during Legion was the final straw for me to quit retail.
1 Like
It makes perfect sense because it gives people the choice instead adversely effecting others.
Occasionally they will even off free xfers.
Faction imbalance is an issue - but offering free transfers to just one side also causes issues.
1 Like
What choice do I have as a char on a server with almost no Horde population?
The free transfers they do eventually offer are a joke cause they have rules around them instead of just being what they should be, the same as the paid transfer.
You response is just another point that Blizzard would prefer to remain as status quo raking in the profits they get from xfers instead of taking any action.
2 Likes
Thsts far from the problem, ita actually ome of the few smart things he said… But sometimes it is like they dont even understand their own game…
“If a server is 70/30 we cant just open up server xfers because then what if all the “30’s” moved???” Or you could… you know… control xfers by faction bot server pop. Its so basic and yet… it apparently hasnt even occurred to them.
But thanks for responding to stupid ideas like merges. 