They have done it for less just to troll, or have you forgotten?
2 Likes
Every tine i have disputed the data i have not claimed the “no rdf” is the majority.
All i have done is point out the FACT that the data being used to “prove” that people “for rdf” are the majority is severely flawed in 2 ways. They are relatively easy for one person to vote myltiple times on and they are more likely to be voted on by people searching to make their voice heard about being upset about no rdf than people who are content wuth how things are because people are morelikely to seek out ways to make their voice heard when they are upset about something.
Again. I am not claimined either side has a majority on this subject. I am pointing out that those polls being paraded around are not a good source of data. Thats all i have been saying about those polls.
No human in the history of humans have ever “challenged data” that agreed with them. You are clearly trying to diminish the “for side” by attacking it. And again, if you are just “pointing out” that the data “could” be flawed, that is still is still not an argument against a majority. For that to be an argument, you would need to provide evidence to the contrary, not just attack the source. Besides, having “the majority” doesn’t even matter. The simple fact that others shouldn’t dictate how we play. I think we all can agree here that data can be inaccurate, and if you have no skin in the game her outside of informing of this fact, move on…unless you have another reason to keep pushing an agenda.
1 Like
Ive stated i dont like rdf im not saying either side is the majority. But there is very clear historical evidence of open polls not being very secure in preventing them from being distorted to show false results.
U gotta watch out for the Private server andy Seraph. He hates blizzard so much but yet still plays there games and gives them 15$ a month lol
So there you go, you do have an agenda. There is a reason to attack the polling data. So like I said, we are aware that polling data can have issues with it, so thanks. Unfortunately, unless you have some additional data with similar amount of respondents, we will have to assume that the majority does support it since that is how these things work.
4 Likes
I hear you. I mean, I’ll still continue to spam heroics as much as I can every day for the badges, use that for “wish” BiS until i can get my actual BiS and then use the badges for whatever Orbs are being used for crafted gear.
The community ain’t torn. The super high vast majority all around wants the Dungeon Finders.
The only people who don’t are the trolls and maybe the legitimate .5% who actively want people to be forced to talk to them in a dungeon for reasons I don’t know or care for.
1 Like
Yeah. I still dont get why they think this is bringing the community together when i have done plenty of dungeons with pugs where no one talks, at all.
Nope it hasn’t you don’t have any empirical data to draw that conclusion.
You can choose to believe that based on statistically insignificant and refutable/mutable evidence and anec dotes but it’s never been “shown”
Botting a strawpoll isn’t going “hardcore hacker”. Voting on a strawpoll when you don’t have an active sub isn’t going hardcore hacker either.
This isn’t goalpost moving, you introduced that it would be silly. It was shown that people have done it for sillier causes and then you called it goalpost moving?? Don’t say it’s silly then… But you have to because the data is insecure if you don’t.
the problem with LFG is once you implement it you cant take it back. That means itll be there for all of classic plus. Nobody wants Cata classic so lets avoid the things that made the game too convenient.
Community isn’t torn between the 2, there’s about 5-10% of the community who do not want RDF and 90% do.
Your numbers are way off. Theres a reason it was removed in the first place. Theres just an extremely vocal snowflake lazy entitled minority that want RDF
Wouldnt they be considered lazy if they WERENT on here voicing their opinion? And Minority? Pfft.
The blue post addressed your suggestion itself.
Splitting how players group up makes everyone’s wait times longer and it’s a bad choice.
well either rdf or player boosting, otherwise, 1-60 is gonna be desolation.
You don’t have any reasonable evidence of this.