they can be more aggressive w/ inflation numbers? was that implemented? he says he “could” be more aggressive, not that they will be more aggressive, hes just spitballing possible changes, not saying thats even the direction theyre going in.
yeah, its pretty terrible on mobile. come back in an hour cuz its like 50pixels total.
Please tell us the alternative explanation for a shorter season than wod s3 having much higher inflation if you don’t think it’s exactly what holinka described intending
yeah fair but you see me being 2806 going 1-6 then not queueing for >3 months
my mmr on the last game of the 1-6 is 2796
that was a loss so the next game should be even lower
3months later the next game is +130 mmr (possibly more because we don’t know how low my mmr got with the final loss pre break)
that’s impossible to argue with
you misunderstood the blue post
you thought they added mmr to people that queued
what they actually said is everyone gets the mmr but people that queue will naturally rise above people that sit
this is easy, participation and amount of people on ladder but sitting. if wod s3 had less participation it wouldnt inflate naturally the same way. if more people are sitting, they arent benefting from the inflation.
idk but it must have been a very high team cuz he lost 0 to it. idk im fully admitting hes probably right here, i just want to see it with more than 12 pixels.
trick question obviously, u don’t gain mmr from losses.
u only gain mmr from wins, and only lose mmr from losses
unless ofc, they implement aggressive inflation, like they did. (in which case you still don’t gain mmr from losses, but u did gain mmr if u just afk’d the season)