this. ta da on one of my other toons
and back again whoo
Because I legit do not agree with you. Itâs crap. He does not, and should not need to submit a written form of elitism in order to present his argument. As an actual fact he has submitted it and I agree with it and there is not a darn thing you can do about either FACT.
1 Like
There is no proof that OP is a troll, or that he does not play Classic. You have created that information, and as far as Iâm aware it is manifestly untrue. But again, I understand it is easier to attack people personally than it is to consider their arguments in their own merits.
No, Iâm really not.
While we are at it. It is NOT logical for you to make outright assumptions based upon zero credible criteria. you have no evidence regarding OPâs nature or intent.
EDIT: Sorry Horace it appears we read each otherâs minds on that one.
1 Like
uhh no he has not and again its not elitism ask the person posting about pvp to use a pvp toon. when what they are telling people to do is leave pvp servers. he he does not play pvp why should listen to him and leave a pvp server.
him refusing to switch off to prove he actually pvps
Oh gosh, I hope youâre trolling me right now.
"I have only ever seen white swans. Therefore, all swans are white. "
That OP is a troll is proved by the top comment.
That he doesnât play classic is shown by his unwillingness to post on his classic toon.
In order for it to be manifestly untrue, there needs to be a direct refutation.
Yes. You really are.
Either you donât understand the distinction, or youâre trolling.
I never said you should listen to him, I said he was right, and you cannot discredit that by attacking his person. Get over this simple idea please.
What you CAN do is try.
1 Like
Actually I do have plenty of evidence right here in this thread. 
God forbid you ever sit on a jury friend.
Take it ez Horace Iâll leave you to it.
1 Like
Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law.
[quote=âTln-herod, post:108, topic:348531, full:trueâ]
That he doesnât play classic is shown by his unwillingness to post on his classic toon.
Iâm literally not. But again, I wouldnât expect somebody who has never studied
political ethics or epistemology to understand this distinction.
lets see makes a post telling people that when phase 2 drops its gonna be a non-stop gankfest ( anyone that played vanilla knows this is not true as you donât get honor for ganking low level toons)
his words not mine. when asked to at least have a pvp classic toon to back up this outright bs his response was to digging and say no iâm not gonna i dont need to prove that i actually pvp.
i gave you this example before but i will do it again Remulos is a trash server the players are rude on it. if you ask for help they well scream slurs at you. all the raiding guilds demand you pay them 500g and then only give the loot to other guild members. dont even try and work the AH on Remulos its completely broken by all the bots that are on the server day and night. trust me i play on remulos I swear.
You are, and I take this as evidence that your claimed qualificaitons are BS.
I play on Remulos and I can tell you that these things are untrue.
Blimey, that was hard, wasnât it?
Ethics are a normative framework by which one considers actions to be categorically just or unjust.
I am arguing that demanding that a person must qualify their opinion with a qualification instead of being judged on their own merits is a categorically unjust precedent to set on the forums.
So, yeah. This is literally ethics.
1 Like
well itâs your word against mine and your part of the guild is taken part of this there and back again are the worst offenders.
I donât have to have a toon on the server. and yet you canât disprove what iâm saying the argument devolves into is he said she said. were asking me to show my remulos toon would have instantly ended a bs argument. because everytime you counter it I will just claim your wrong or lieing
Yup. But the truth does not fear inquiry, and a rigorous debate on the matter is sure to shed light on the answer. I donât feel the need to lock out opinions with which I disagree.
1 Like
So far, youâve been making an argument that itâs incorrect to attempt to discredit OP in that way. You havenât said anything about it being unjust until now.
Thatâs not ethics. Thatâs logic.
Now you want to present a new argument and pretend youâve been using it all along.
The new argument is ethics, but youâre a troll for trying this switcharoo tactic.