basically a child youre saying with 0 self awareness.
yep i agree
None of that can be proven true in a lab. itâs not science, itâs just an assumption. a theory that can not be physically proven. Unlike there being only two genders, where science can prove it in a lab, with chromosomes.
1 Like
See the thing is that there is a difference between respecting these issues, and then having to see this in World of Warcraft. Itâs a game with elves and orcs where IRL doesnât matter and we can just escape. Iâm a big fat panda on the forums, not who I am IRL.
2 Likes
Science isnât quite that black and white. Thereâs good and bad science in the world after all. As much as weâd like it to be otherwise, scientists are no less prone to shoddy workmanship as any other profession. Someone expressing skepticism at a scientific claim is actually a good thing as thatâs the entire basis of science in the first place. If you ever reach the point where you are just accepting as gospel something someone in a white coat said then youâre doing science wrong. Ironically, youâre also treating science like a religion at that point and become vulnerable to the same traps people who are too deep into religious dogma fall into.
I also donât really see that many vaccine nuts. Iâm a conservative in a very conservative community and even we all think anti-vaxxers are crazy. Weâre all a fan of our polio-free world.
Letâs have a brew sometime.
1 Like
I mean, youâre not wrong, but at the same time⌠I donât really see that much of an issue with it if people want it as an option to place on their character title. That being said⌠knowing the gaming world⌠people who use these pronouns would probably just be painting a target on their head.
Then again that isnât inherently all bad, as you can quickly see whoâs likely to align with how you view the world.
2 Likes
Translation:
âI canât argue with them. I better attack the person instead of the argument!â
Thatâs all you have at this point I guess. Anger and pettiness. Well. Iâll challenge all of your points and the personal charges you levied with two simple words. âProve itâ. Because are you as intelligent as you claim to be, you would remember that burden of proof is on the accuser, not the defense.
You will note that I did not attack you one time. I did not label you specifically as a zealot. I instead went for a broader term, and at no point did I mention you by name. This was all intended. While I could have chosen to attack you personally, I instead opted to attack your arguments.
I said I rejected your stances. I reject your science as trash, because it never has been given a fair shake in the scientific process. I also reject your views, and your style of attacking individuals; rather than their arguments. However, I do not reject you as an individual. I merely believe you are wrong. Perhaps wrongfully informed, mistaken, or another word. Nothing more. That is not a crime, and I will not condemn you for that. Yet this⌠caused you to melt down. Curious.
For the record the quote is not âAhh FAKE NEWS!â
The quote is actually⌠âAhh! Real Monsters!â You are welcome friend.
When you return with tangible proof, and not proof that is approved by ideologically driven individuals, then I may consider your stances. But until we can question, (and thus have research, hypothesis and experiments occur prior to final observations and conclusions). I cannot find any reason to trust anything you said as fact.
The reason I cannot trust your word, is because when I do a basic âcompare and contrastâ I note that must consider that there is not much a difference between the method used currently by âscienceâ, and the Church in the middle-ages. Both believe their views are beyond reproach, and both were fond of punishing heresy that spoke against it.
âHistory is after all a loop.â I trust you recognize the quote and the irony in it.
Prove that what you say is truth. Not with ideology and ranting, but with fact. As long as you attack the individual (such as the erroneous and foolish anti-vax charge) and not the argument however, you already lost your credibility and the chance to prove your point. I would of thought this would be understood. Perhaps they no longer teach speech in school however.
4 Likes
So much white privilege/supremacy going on rnâŚdisgusting.
I think thatâs one of the greatest disappointments of the current technological landscape. Weâve become so good at identifying and separating ourselves from people on âthe other sideâ that we forget how to interact with them.
??? now youâre 100% trolling
No no. Look at your character model. Youâre literally white. Not Caucasian, white.
How can there be white privilege in a computer-generated model? Please provide proof of this claim as well when you do respond. I am eager to debate this and understand the logic you used to come to such a conclusion.
Even if we go out-of-game with it, there is zero evidence that the people disagreeing are caucasian, and even if they are, itâs actually racist to assert that the disagreement stems from their race.
6 Likes
Is this thing where you get to assume the race of everyone who disagrees with you similar to when you were complaining about people assuming gender?
1 Like
Iâm so glad I have resigned from humanity a while ago. I no longer consider myself a human being. Itâs BS like this post that make me realize how doomed we are as a society.
Walking off this plantation was the best thing I ever did. BTW, Iâm messaging you from Omicron Persei VIII. The reception can be a bit wonky from time to time, but Lrrr letâs me use his laptop to bash obtuse discussions like this.
4 Likes
That seems pretty logical, but Iâd like to hear his explanation and how he came to such a conclusion. Call it the âQuestionâ section of the scientific process. If they have an answer I can then go to researching it, and forming a hypothesis.
Again white privilege is a racist concept. You are generalizing a race. I would also like to point out every race has had its share of oppression so who is privileged or not isnt a road we should go down. An easy example is the Irish look up how they were historically treated and they are white. Or Americas Japanese interment camps.
2 Likes
And how do you know the race of any individual here. And even more importantly why does their race matter?
The act of treating people differently based on the immutable characteristic of race is racism and this is what you are doing. I instead judge you not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character, which I find wanting.
Iâm not human either, Iâm an elven death knight irl actually, and I do not approve of OPâs message.