Mate this might be the dumbest compromise to WoW token’s I’ve heard !! Seriously we don’t want to play dress the barbie with transmog, we don’t want barber shops, we most certainly don’t want neo pets integrated into classic. The vast majority definitely wan’t TBC also, oh and best yet ?? We definitely don’t want any resemblance of the Diablo 3 inspired Warcraft ARPG you call retail in Classic. Period.
2 Likes
I’m already paying a subscription fee, so no, and shut up.
Why do you chuckleheads think that this is in any way a viable idea to recreating TBC content? You’ll replicate TBC content and TBC talent trees and somehow exclude the leveling and scaling from 60-70? Why in the world would blizzard do that over releasing a TBClassic under their most complete TBC patch?
Sometimes I find it hard to believe that I breathe the same air as you people.
No, thank you.
1 Like
I would rather deal with WoW tokens than new age devs trying to make old world content. I enjoyed the game through TBC and WoTLK. Ill take that train please.
But thats not what it is. Becuase #somechanges
Please Activsion MONETIZE EVERYTHING you can in classic PLEASE
Some people work at game companies, making games
Other people work at walmart
as a door greeter.
This thread should stop anyone from ever wondering why that is.
no, classic is already monetized, this is not a free to play game, and there are minimal operating costs. no alternate income streams are needed.
2 Likes
“I’m A ReVoLuTiOnArY aNd I WiLl cHaNgE cLaSsIc WiTh My BoLd IdEaS!”
You’re not wrong in hating tokens/level boosts, but you’re also a problem of its own.
Self-only transmog seems redundant. I care deeply about what my character looks like, but if others see something other than what I do, I cannot enjoy myself in a delusion. Yes, that’s merely my perspective, but then there’s the economy.
Minimal impact? If people actually invest into transmog, it’ll actually ruin the low level economy.
Paying for expansions when many of us have already done so is not a bloody solution. Saying we need to pay more than the sub is absurd.
SELL the pet battle system? Firstly, selling something you don’t need to pay for in retail (which is included n the sub) is so dumb it’s funny. If you meant sell pets, then well…nice economy changes there.
Watered down gameplay aside, it’s just not a great idea.
I like how you say mounts won’t change the game, then also say
Contradictions aren’t fun.
Your whole post reeks of troll, but there’s enough sincerity in it for me to genuinely dislike it.
Ooook so you’re trolling.
Nice.
just go play retail??? sorry bad ideas not for classic
Better idea for making money make wow retail and classic free to play and full pay2win. Sure players will quit since many people don’t like p2w but that will be massively outweighed by the younger players you will pull in with free to play. Then you make way more money overall and hook new players to your games young. We all get a growing community and lose a few aging players reaching the stage of life they become less inclined to spend money on games despite having more of it and the ones that do and stay will pay insane amounts. Trying to just hook old players is why you had a sub spike with classic then they all left it has nothing to do with the game and everything to do with the aging population who no longer has the time to no life wow like they did in 2004 you need to target players who are 20 years old and younger today.
Because they have stated MANY times that forced level progression was a mistake. Forced level progression invalidates ALL previous content, period end of discussion.
Do you even play this game? Classic is not Vanilla, it is NOT a remake. #somechanges
IDGAF what you think, Thanks for the bump!
I’ll buy some name changes. Definitely.
No, I wont reroll.
Why do you assume this to be true? Subs pay for maintenance and a nice profit. It’s very profitable, given that they aren’t even making content for it.
IT’S MA’AM!
1 Like
You’d fit right in with the retail WoW dev team.
And playerbase.
You’re welcome, and see ya!
1 Like
I can’t imagine that Classic was too expenseive…all the assets and everything else are just recycled from 15 years ago.
Also, look at how much Activision/Blizzard is worth…then tell me again how they “NEED to make more money on this game”.
If making the game free-to-play would attract younger players, wouldn’t pay-to-win push them away as well? You can’t make the statement that younger players would be more willing to play because the game is free (because of their financial situation), then make the statement that your younger crowd would drive your pay-to-win purchases…
Either they have money, or they don’t.
Your argument seems to have went from financial accessibility to one where it appears that the younger crowd just wants things to be easier/more convenient.
Free to play and pay to win are the same system I guess unless you count pay to cosmetic as something separate though in wow with no clear objective as to how you “win” I would argue they are synonymous here. They don’t have money they bring more players into the game with its popularity that do. I mean I don’t really think I need to make a case for why these systems make more money blizzard already knows just like everyone who is swapping to these models. It’s not about convenience it’s about barrier to entry they simply cannot afford to pay a sub for a game. Also hook them now and when they do get money later you have customers for life as evidenced by classic.
Hell no dude. This might be worse that the tokens lol
1 Like