Oh, my bad. I’m sure that a known logical fallacy is suddenly correct because it spews forth from your mouth. I’ll be sure to inform the rest of the world that they were wrong on that one. Here, go ahead and correct the wikipedia page. I’m sure they’ll accept your edit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope Hey, you understand how the rumor mill works!
you nailed it I have given you a <3,Personal loot gives less loot, is random on what it gives(mind you you have 40 people to gear)and I am curious if others would consider a healing paladin a ninja looter because he rolled on +healing cloth gear, considering the fact that was really the only type of gear for healers. 
Where’s my Heart 'cause I said it, first! 
it was given to thee ! <3
That doesn’t provide any proof of steamrolling. What you’ve done is list a bunch of things people feel would add meaningful and positive improvements to the game, presumably without having an impact on the core gameplay that people are enjoying in classic.
By lumping them together, you prove your ignorance and your inability to think critically. A discussion on a topic does not automatically mean that a change will be implemented. It’s useful to discuss these items on a per change basis because it provides opportunity to highlight why such a change may not be as positive as someone thinks they are. If you don’t like something, that’s fine, but instead of saying “#nochanges” and repeating ignorant streamer rhetoric, say why you think that change is not good.
#Nochanges
Personal loot actually gives more loot (about 20% more, iirc) but that’s besides the point.
Rumor has it that people who make bad faith arguments tend to run high in the dark triad personality facets, particularly narcissism and machiavellianism. But hey. That’s just a rumor.
Back to square one, again.
It is steam rolling because they “don’t effect the game, right”? Implement all four of them because “they don’t effect the game”, Classic is no longer Classic, anymore. “Discussing” them is always the same. Either we accept the “suggestion” or nip it the butt. There’s no in between.
It’s only a matter of time, before we repeat history.
No, it doesn’t. Farming old dungeons, it’s less.
Again, you’re just focused on my character and not actually trying to have constructive dialogue. Making your Posts all about the insults.
So by layering being in the game its not classic anyway correct?
This has been answered multiple times in this thread. The only response that is left is to make is #Nochanges.
Once again, just because there’s “already changes”, doesn’t mean we have to continue dragging Classic through the mud, since “it’s not Vanilla, anyway, LOL”. And I don’t accept any of the changes. There’s a difference.
#Nochanges is a meme. There have been so many changes already and even prior to it being launched your little movement was defeated before it began.
This has also been answered multiple times in this thread.
#Nochanges.
/facepalm…You’ve proven that you have no interest in constructive discussion. If you want to play dirty, that’s fine by me, but don’t whine when I point out that you’re a poisonous snake that’s bitten this thread.
No one is denying how easy MC / Ony is. But Barbershops have more of a place in Classic than making changes to Raid encounters so Pserver players feel more accomplished with 90 seconds kills instead of 60 second kills.
^ Again, precisely the mentality I keep fighting against. Just because “it’s not Vanilla, anyway, LOL”, doesn’t mean we have to continue dragging Classic through the Mud.
Again, you haven’t pointed where I messed up. Haven’t provided Quotes. Just making statements against my character, as your argument. I’m having plenty of constructive discussion. You’re just not included 'cause all you care about is my character. That’s all you seem to talk about.
You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means. (Sorry, had to.)
Seriously, though, you have done nothing but call him names and attack the man rather than the argument. You’re about as constructive as the Hiroshima bomb.
I attacked his slippery slope argument about 4 times over… lolwut… How much more can I say than the fact that his argument constitutes a textbook Slippery Slope Argument? 4head…