Besides, you can’t really hide anything given the box allows you to look at the entire quote anyway by clicking on the arrows in the upper right corner.
I tell this to people all the time when they think I’m doing some out-of context bs or whatever.
You can’t be taken out of context on these forums because the system won’t let you!
if he didn’t regret implementing it, he would have added “but overall it was a good change”, or something to that effect. but nice try. your damage control is getting better
If you actually read through his Twitter, he has many retrospective takes. Do you automatically assume he regrets everything he didn’t 100% agree with?
32, married, 6 y/o kid. Decently employed. Certainly never run in to complaints about my maturity if that’s what you’re trying to imply.
Let us have the victory lap, you all have spent a lot of time putting a lot of weight in to “What would Ghostcrawler do?” only to wind up with a severe amount of egg on your face and it’s a little bit funny. Whether he actually regrets it or not, he clearly had feelings that mimic almost 1:1 the concerns we have about adding it to TBCC…where it doesn’t and never will belong.
It means that our concerns literally line up with his concerns, and you can’t really take that away from us. We also have multiple instances of other blues of-the-time stating similar things, as the OP posted.
It’s clear that the 50g respec was a INTENDED DESIGN. That’s really the crux of the matter, and because it is so, it should be one of the things that is immune to the #somechanges rhetoric.
There are bullies on both sides. If you call one side out, you call both out for it. This is my only point.
Lol, get out of here with that kids table stuff. I am not fighting for dual spec nor against it. I’m not victimized in any way on this forum. I just pointed out an inconsistency and unfortunately set off some usual suspects
You fail to mention that was from 2007 and perhaps fail to realize that it has no relevance what so ever with this version of the game. We didn’t have boosts back then either but we certainly have them now. You then edit in a twitter comment from 2013. It’s just as irrelevant. Btw, they later put in dual spec with wrath, so them saying “we’re not doing that” before wrath just shows that their word is worth less than dirt.
“When else was TBC first talked about? It’s kind of the point that the comment would come from when TBC first came out, would it not? Why would you assume it’s from anything other than TBC?”
-The thread implies they’ve commented about THIS version of the game, which is what THIS forum is for. But in reality you’re just referencing things from ages ago on older versions. There is no relevance. This is called a bait and switch, and not even a good one as no attempt was made to hide the dates. Furthermore, you’re not even posting from a character on this game. You’re using a retail sockpuppet. Go back to leveling your death knight or something.
When else was TBC first talked about? It’s kind of the point that the comment would come from when TBC first came out, would it not? Why would you assume it’s from anything other than TBC?