New WoW cosmology (spoilers)

I think the void comes across as too degenerative and dangerous to really care for any balance with. The literal class resource for its primary player usage case is insanity. Alleria is a ticking time bomb, who had to bail out the Void Elves. Introducing a Shadow that, perhaps still with a certain amount of danger, but has a less inherently playing in a gasoline and fire match festival feel to it would be good for nuance in the cosmology.

2 Likes

If you think Blizzard is going to literally and canonically merge Warcraft with Babylon 5 (copyright issues aside)… I have no words for how crazy you are.

No… no, you’re not serious, you can’t be?

1 Like

You do know who you’re talking to, right?

5 Likes

I merely assume Blizzard was using the Vorlons as inspiration for the First Ones since many Fans before me have drawn parallels between Oribos and Babylon 5 itself.

1 Like

? What I wrote is just a long way of saying the devs are spineless IRL and thus are spineless in their creations

4 Likes

Phew, okay, I see now, fair enough. You talk with awfully… literal language, sometimes.

Regarding the question in the third paragraph; because some people have been comparing the naaru to the Vorlons from Babylon 5, along with the Light vsVoid conflict being compared to the Vorlons vs Shadows war.

Plus, given how the Vorlons end up as antagonists, some also plumb the show for excuses to justify the villain batting of the Light and naaru.

1 Like

Incidentally names have to be Trademarked to be protected as names can’t be Copyrighted. Trademarked Names have to be constantly protected or the Trademark will be declared abandoned and they will have to file a new Trademark to replace it.

Does anyone know if the Vorlon Trademark still exists? I just checked and only found an abandoned(as in canceled due to someone else using it without getting sued) Trademark for an Electronic cigarette liquid…

If it doesn’t than Blizzard has nothing stopping it from using the name themselves(that’s if they realize that they can use it though…)!

Incidentally the Naaru’s top parts resemble the Centauri Hairstyle:

Naaru: https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/wowpedia/images/c/cd/Naaru.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20181022201121

Centauri: https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/babylon5/images/a/a7/ActsofsacrificeLondoVir01.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20080420172755

If it turns out Blizzard is making the First Ones the WoW Counterpart to the Vorlons I wouldn’t be surprised if the Naaru become counterparts of the Centauri.

1 Like

Uhhhhh what, only real one, what about, Life and Death being in the middle, thats no accident

1 Like

Someone didnt listen to the audio story from legion, they are already villain batted

The Vorlon trademark will last, according to current laws, until at least 50 years after the Babylon 5 showrunner dies, assuming he doesn’t give someone else the rights.

The naaru are closer to the Vorlons than the Centauri.

  • The Vorlons are energy beings, and in their natural form the Vorlons’ energy takes the form of light. The cosmic force the naaru serve is the Light.
  • The vorlons have presented themselves as figures from various religions, including angels. The naaru have served as analogous to angels in prior lore, especially towards the Draenei.
  • There is a group founded and led by the Vorlons called Army of Light. Where have we heard a similar term in WoW?
  • Naaru look like crystallized versions of Vorlons’ real forms.
  • The Vorlons diametrically opposed enemy is the Shadows. The Light’s diametrically opposed enemy is the Void who might be getting renamed Shadow with the latest retcons.
  • Edit: The Vorlon speech sounds like a sequence of overlapping musical tones, chirps and chimes. As the naaru do until they started getting voice-acted lines with Saa’ra, Xe’ra and Z’rali.

I rest my case.

6 Likes

Wisps given a lazy response

Guess they’re listening to some lore gaps we point out

5 Likes

“Beings of Elune’s origin ‘can’t be trusted’?” And what makes the author of this book trustworthy?

Seriously, Blizzard’s third love after retcons and Sylvanas seems to be contrarianism. And maybe the first and the third are connected.

This book is written in the perspective of Death by a Broker who thinks the cosmos exists to sustain the Shadowlands

A being of Life would not be trusted by a being of Death

8 Likes

Been saying this since the reveal that Sylvanas lied in her headmovies.
Stop buying Blizzard’s out of game items.

13 Likes

While that explains the in-universe reasoning, that still doesn’t make the Brokers’ claim about Elune accurate.

The only people villain-batting there were some WoW fans salty about everyone’s favorite naaru (!) punishing Alleria for her continued Void use; Xe’ra might have gotten heavy-handed, but Alleria did lie/break a promise to her and collude with a sworn enemy so it wasn’t without reason.

That’s kind of his point.

Unlike Chronicle, which they’ve retroactively implied paints things in a pro-titan light (it frankly doesn’t, as it’s basically the story of how their efforts to spread Order have been derailed and corrupted at every turn. The first volume in particular basically boils down to “how the titans failed” and it pretty dryly assesses the titans’ own shortcomings when it comes to ignorance about certain aspects of reality), the Girmoire is outright told from the PoV of a Broker who seems to frequently and dogmatically editorialize his descriptions.

So indeed, his claim that a being such as Elune isn’t to be trusted isn’t true by virtue of his having said it, though admittedly it isn’t made definitively false by that metric either.

4 Likes

You forgot the visions of the light destroying all life on worlds

Not meant to be accurate, it’s meant to be shady and melodramatic

2 Likes

The same visions that Alleria swiftly identified as lies.

The point of those visions wasn’t to show what the Light actually does. It was a representation of the Void’s hyperbolic aversion to the Light, wherein the Void sees its opposite as a force of fundamental rigidity and adherence to a single truth that excludes all else, at odds with the Void’s own embrace of every infinite possibility being equally valid and true.

Ultimately its purpose was to drive home that the Void speaks a billion lies, but not because it knows they’re lies. It does so because it thinks they’re all true.

9 Likes