I’ve been hearing this ever since DKs were implemented…
Makes my eyes roll every time
1 Like
Say examples please, would like to see them. (Not hating, just wanna see multiple ideas)
1 Like
And they were right
Evokers are just mages with wings, warloks are just mages with Green fire. Pallys are priests with plate armor. We could just keep going
Even more celestial magic being introduced via a class
Chronomancy class
Blademaster granted thats basically arms warrior
That’s why we’ve had 3 more.classes added right…
I’m just happy people are even talking about the Tinker class. It used to feel like an underground topic, but it’s nice to see it gaining more attention.
2 Likes
None of those things are the same but keep trying
But shaman and tinkers are??? Lol what?
2 Likes
I was about to say the same thing XD
1 Like
With different themes yes. Blizzard would just mske then like totem shamans
Abd tinker class is not the same as a profesión, just saying
Oh right kinda like lock and mages, priests and paladins, interesting…
3 Likes
Accept none of those are the same
Neither is elemental magic and gunfire lol
Ok then plz tell me the last time a shaman hopped in a mech suit and called in an artillery strike?
1 Like
Im pretty sure i heard somewhere that they were actually planning on deleting a few classes.
You eont get ether ond of those things if blizzard actally made the class a thing.
Edit: well artillery strike maybe. It would just be volly
Where did you hear that? that would cause devastation. Quite a claim to make so casually.
What makes you so sure? A mech suit would surely either be a CD or a static combat “form”
The only reason you’re even comparing shaman and tinkers is because of turrets, as if all shaman and tinker would be is turrets …
1 Like