…keep Tyrande front and center in the story until Sylvanas is dealt with? Don’t write her out because “we don’t want to give too much focus to Tyrande” when they clearly have zero issue giving plenty of focus to Saurfang, Sylvanas, Nathanos, Jaina, etc.
Why is too much focus on Tyrande a bad thing, when they literally just killed off the vast majority of the Night off population?
Instead, they’re constantly giving us Shandris, who has been MIA for most of WoW. They’re overusing Shandris when it should be Tyrande.
Giving focus to Tyrande is not a bad thing, like they seem to think it is. This is the issue we have. There is a reason she should have focus. She SHOULD have focus. Period. She should be involved in EVERY major Alliance battle until BFA is over and she actually gets vengeance against Sylvanas.
If this entire thing is because they don’t intend for Sylvanas to die, be arrested, or anything and BFA to end with the Alliance forgiving Sylvanas, there WILL be unhappy responses on the forums and most likely mass unsubscribing from Alliance players.
There’s only so far you can push the Alliance before we’ll break, and if they let Sylvanas get away with everything and then end BFA and tell us we have to forgive her for ANY reason, people will quit the game, I GUARANTEE it.
No, killing ONE of her Val’kyr is not revenge.
If Tyrande had killed ALL of her Val’kyr AND Nathanos, it would have been revenge, because then Tyrande would have stripped her of her most faithful servant and the ability to resurrect new forsaken, and thus it would have been an equal loss.
How? Sylvanas would have lost the Forsaken. She would have no way to create new Forsaken - she would have lost her people. The future. She would have lost the one person who followed her without question.
But instead Blizzard took the cheap way out and expected Alliance to be okay with it.