Moonkin form armor

It worked out for warlocks when they removed demon armor. It’s not like these changes happen in a vacuum. Just go bear form.

That’s a lot of physical dmg there.

just go bear 4head warlocks also get a 300k shield and passive 15% more stam
spriests get passive 15% dmg reduction
theres trade offs other classes get
as warrior you get a passive barkskin and ignore pain also your plate and have more armor :slight_smile:

3 Likes

only about 35% of that is physical damage that is mitigated by armor

and druids get bear form :crazy_face:

Not really the point, he said enhance is 70% magic dmg which is just untrue.

1 Like

and you know what i cant do in bear form? damage thats why boomkin players in raid and M+ have been complaining about druid defensives this whole xpac because druids cant do soak mechanics with out a external cd

1 Like

65% wasn’t that far off from 70

just put dots on everything :crazy_face:

Enh is a 50/50 mix. But a lot of kill pressure comes from melee. The rest is padded damage/pve rotation.

45.7% of the dmg in that details window was physical. Being closer to 50/50 is pretty far away from 70/30.

your so fried man im outta here lmfao just dot every thing 4head both dots combined do 11k so ill do 20-26k dps while i sit bear form if i have dots on all 3 targets

1 Like

Windstrike bypasses armor, so while yes it is physical, it’s closer in function to magic.

Besides the point, I’m not arguing what is effected by armor or what isn’t.

When someone is talking about physical damage they are specifically talking about whether its mitigated by armor or not.

1 Like

I think everybody else is
The thread title, etc

1 Like

Just pop out of bear form and one shot someone with full moon :crazy_face:

Sure, I’m not talking bout moonkin armor anymore as it seems to be not as insane as I originally thought after I looked at my DK armor.

can we go back to this. what passive 15% damage reduction

When being hit by melee attackers they get a stack that reduces damage they take… one might actually call that “reactive”

Focused will I assume. Does that not exist anymore

Okay then they’re just dumb and wrong.

Nvm Bcruiser gaslit me.