i love how the av’s afk players cry when they get banned and then they claim they was a false suspension because of mass report.
ofc if you afk in the bg you will get reported by the other players
i love how the av’s afk players cry when they get banned and then they claim they was a false suspension because of mass report.
ofc if you afk in the bg you will get reported by the other players
Mass reports can and do lead to automatic bans without human eyeballs. All companies are utilizing automatic systems and AI to replace human beings because it saves them money.
Activision Blizzard is no exception.
I’m sure I wiped you a few times this week on Blissard don’t even try and spread that BS I never afk
This is factually incorrect and has been pointed out by a gigantic amount of people that have been auto banned.
Most people receiving account actions in AV will not be for being AFK, but instead are for chat infractions. It’s really quite rare to see people actually get suspended for being AFK, as the threshold for it is extremely high. The poster in this thread also wasn’t actioned for being AFK, but for chat infractions, and according to them have been overturned. These are completely different types of things.
In this case, it pretty much sounds like they were baited into “conversations” which were then likely reported, and I suspect could be why they might have been overturned. Versus the more inappropriate/toxic chat which usually doesn’t but which we see most violations being for…
That’s exactly correct I was warned by the other defenders not to speak in BG chat via whispers but I didn’t think it was an issue if I wasn’t being offensive or using obscene language I know now to just not speak in chat if I’m going to defend.
I’m sure I wiped you a few times this week on Blissard don’t even try and spread that BS I never afk
what do you mean?
I mean I’m sure if you got honor capped this week I wiped you at some point doing Drek, I don’t afk
Vann* I just started playing alliance
there is no auto ban.
what youre referring to is a squelch. theyre not hte same tho
Honestly, there is a lot of toxicity in PvP and it really comes out in AV weekend when some people want to simply grind as much rep in 3 minute BGs, staying out of chat other than to call things like incoming, or request help in a tower thats under attack is always the way to go.
Good luck going forward.
I mean I’m sure if you got honor capped this week I wiped you at some point doing Drek, I don’t afk
if you say so
but i haven’t joined a single bg this whole week.
Whenever you enter AV, report all the other 39 players on your team, just on principle. We’re all even then.
Another Tinfoil hat thread!
Good, keep banning people who are being impolite/AFK. Good riddance
all their GMs are in the US.
All two of them?
I think there’s 3?
But yes
This is factually incorrect and has been pointed out by a gigantic amount of people that have been auto banned.
really can you show me these facts and truths?
You really don’t need to worry about mass reports, the only thing that happens from mass reports would be a short term temporary squelch and honestly thats not likely in a BG, for most anything that could get you an actual silence or suspension in a BG only takes a single report, and those are all reviews by a GM. However it’s relatively easy to avoid getting actioned and likely even reported in any BG, here are some simple suggestions:
No, their are straight up bans being handed out for mass reports atm.
Two of my friends got reported for farming mid in AV and got week suspensions.
Zero chat happened from them in these games
No, their are straight up bans being handed out for mass reports atm.
You can keep choosing to believe this lie all you want.
You can keep choosing to believe this lie all you want.
You can choose to believe whatever you want, there’s being right and being ignorant though.
Time and time again, wrongful bans have gone out. If you ever left the echo chamber of the general forums and visited Reddit or customer support. You’d find many situations where it proves it exists.